<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-30T02:13:21Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:munzur-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:munzur/2595" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://munzur-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:munzur-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:munzur/2595</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-28T15:29:56Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_munzur_1</setSpec><setSpec>col_munzur_2</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Corrigendum to “Carbon and water balance of an afforested shallow drained peatland in Iceland” [For. Ecol. Manage. 482 (2021) 118861] (Forest Ecology and Management (2021) 482, (S0378112720316303), (10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118861))</dc:title><dc:creator>Bjarnadottir, Brynhildur</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sungur, Guler Aslan</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sigurdsson, Bjarni D.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kjartansson, Bjarki T.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Oskarsson, Hlynur</dc:creator><dc:creator>Oddsdottir, Edda S.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gunnarsdottir, Gunnhildur E.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Black, Andrew</dc:creator><dc:description>The authors regret that the total evapotranspiration shown in Fig. 7 (821 mm) was the measured H2O flux for the whole two year measurement period. The correct average value for the two years was 411 mm yr−1, or 33% of the measured annual average precipitation. This left 827 mm yr−1 as the “estimated runoff” (see corrected figure). The sign of the average NEE values in the Abstract and Conclusions should be negative. All other information is correct, including the equations and interpretations. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience this has caused. [Figure presented]</dc:description><dc:publisher>Elsevier B.V.</dc:publisher><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:type>Correction</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/2595</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118934</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>0378-1127</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Forest Ecology and Management</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://munzur-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/munzur/2595</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>