<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-30T03:26:35Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:munzur-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:munzur/4643" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://munzur-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:munzur-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:munzur/4643</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-28T15:49:40Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>com_munzur_1</setSpec><setSpec>col_munzur_2</setSpec><setSpec>com_munzur_8</setSpec><setSpec>col_munzur_161</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Compensatory growth response of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) under cycled starvation and restricted feeding rate</dc:title><dc:creator>Türkmen, Serhat</dc:creator><dc:creator>Eroldogan, Orhan Tufan</dc:creator><dc:creator>Yilmaz, Hatice Asuman</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ölçülü, Abdullatif</dc:creator><dc:creator>Inan, Gul Ayten Kiris</dc:creator><dc:creator>Erçen, Zeynep</dc:creator><dc:creator>Tekelioglu, Nazmi</dc:creator><dc:subject>compensatory growth</dc:subject><dc:subject>European sea bass</dc:subject><dc:subject>Dicentrarchus labrax</dc:subject><dc:subject>optimum feeding</dc:subject><dc:subject>starvation</dc:subject><dc:description>The compensatory growth response of the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) that faced cycling starvation and restricted ration was assessed. Juveniles (10.5g) were stocked into 15 tanks at a density of 25 fish per tank. Five different feeding regimes were tested on triplicate groups of fish: CSatiation: control fed for 60days without deprivation, CRestricted: 25% restricted feeding, S-R: 1day starvation then 4days CRestricted feeding, R-F: 1day CRestricted feeding then 4days CSatiation feeding, and, finally, S-F: 1day starvation then 4days CSatiation feeding. The specific growth rate of fish in the CSatiation (2.5 +/- 0.06%day-1), S-F (2.5 +/- 0.11%day-1) and R-F (2.4 +/- 0.18%day-1) were significantly higher than that of CRestricted (2.2 +/- 0.05%day-1) or S-R (2.0 +/- 0.01%day-1). Fish in S-F group were able to achieve catching up with the CSatiation. There was no significant difference in feed conversion rates but R-F and S-F consumed approximately 34% more feed than CSatiation following the first re-feeding day. Although, the highest lipid content was observed in CSatiation (14.4%), S-R (33.3% dry matter) had the highest water content compared with the CSatiation and CRestricted (37.8% and 36.9% dry matter respectively). In conclusion, it may be concluded that sea bass has rapid response to cycling starvation/re-feeding and that a 25% restricted feeding ratio is insufficient to invoke a compensatory growth response in sea bass.</dc:description><dc:publisher>WILEY</dc:publisher><dc:date>2012-10</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/4643</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02970.x</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>1355-557X</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>AQUACULTURE RESEARCH</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://munzur-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/munzur/4643</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>