<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-29T20:43:14Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:munzur-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:munzur/752" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://munzur-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:munzur-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:munzur/752</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-28T15:28:10Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_munzur_1</setSpec><setSpec>col_munzur_2</setSpec><setSpec>com_munzur_8</setSpec><setSpec>col_munzur_154</setSpec><setSpec>com_munzur_11</setSpec><setSpec>col_munzur_162</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Numerical analysis of PCM integrated in solar dryers for thermal efficiency</dc:title><dc:creator>Bakır Gür, Eda</dc:creator><dc:creator>Işık, Erdem</dc:creator><dc:creator>Uçar, Aynur</dc:creator><dc:subject>CFD</dc:subject><dc:subject>Melting</dc:subject><dc:subject>PCM</dc:subject><dc:subject>Renewable energy</dc:subject><dc:subject>Solar dryer</dc:subject><dc:subject>Thermal energy storage</dc:subject><dc:description>Solar dryers using phase change materials buffer heat, yet the combined influence of airflow regime and PCM placement on melting remains underexplored. A controlled like-for-like study fixed geometry and PCM properties while varying placement and operating conditions. A 3D transient CFD model simulated a forced-convection dryer with RT28HC over Re = 3000–9000 and inlet temperatures Ti = 50–60 °C. Raising either Re or Ti shortened melt time, and three-wall coverage melted faster and more uniformly than a rear-wall-only layout. For three walls, melt time dropped from 13 h (50 °C, Re = 3000) to 7 h (60 °C, Re = 9000) (−46 %) for the rear wall it fell from 19 h to 11 h (−42 %). A 10 °C increase in Ti reduced overall melt time by 4 h across Re. Practically, three wall PCM with Re ≥ 6000 at Ti = 60 °C achieved reliably 7–9 h melting, enabling late afternoon heat release without auxiliary heating.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Ain Shams University</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/752</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2025.103847</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>2090-4479</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Ain Shams Engineering Journal</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://munzur-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/munzur/752</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>