Comparative Microstructural, Mechanical, and Tribological Evaluation of Cu Matrix Composites Reinforced with B4C, B, Cr, Co, Al2O3, and Graphite via Powder Metallurgy

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ2

Özet

Copper and its alloys are widely used in electrical, automotive, aerospace, and energy applications because of their excellent thermal and electrical conductivity. However, the low hardness and poor wear resistance of pure Cu limit its use under tribologically demanding sliding conditions. In this study, Cu matrix composites reinforced with 1 wt.% boron carbide (B4C), boron (B), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), alumina (Al2O3), and graphite (Gr) were fabricated by powder metallurgy and comparatively evaluated under identical processing and testing conditions. Phase constitution and microstructural characteristics were analyzed by XRD, SEM, and EDS, while mechanical and tribological behavior was assessed by Vickers hardness and dry sliding wear tests. All reinforcements improved the hardness of the Cu matrix compared with unreinforced Cu. The hardness increase followed the order Cu–B4C (68.91%) > Cu–B (66.43%) > Cu–Gr (63.97%) > Cu–Al2O3 (61.79%) > Cu–Cr (42.69%) > Cu–Co (36.04%). Dry sliding wear tests, performed under a 10 N normal load, 0.05 m s−1 sliding speed, and 1000 m sliding distance against a 316L stainless-steel ball, showed that all reinforced composites exhibited lower mass loss and more stable sliding behavior than pure Cu. Among all samples, Cu–B4C displayed the best wear performance, with a 154.8% improvement in wear resistance relative to pure Cu. SEM analysis of the worn surfaces revealed that reinforcement addition reduced severe plastic deformation, groove formation, and delamination, leading to a more stable wear regime. Graphite- and boron-containing composites benefited from interfacial lubrication and contact stabilization, whereas B4C and Al2O3 improved wear resistance through rigid-particle strengthening and enhanced load-bearing capacity. By comparing ceramic, metalloid, metallic, oxide, and solid-lubricating reinforcements at the same low addition level and under identical processing and testing conditions, this study provides a reinforcement-selection framework for Cu-based composites requiring improved hardness and dry-sliding durability.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/1455Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants14060243Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
2
WoS
2
OpenAlex
2
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorMacit, Cevher Kursat
dc.contributor.authorGürgenç, Turan
dc.contributor.authorAksakal, Bunyamin
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Naim
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:54:13.648324265Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:54:13.648324265Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractCopper and its alloys are widely used in electrical, automotive, aerospace, and energy applications because of their excellent thermal and electrical conductivity. However, the low hardness and poor wear resistance of pure Cu limit its use under tribologically demanding sliding conditions. In this study, Cu matrix composites reinforced with 1 wt.% boron carbide (B4C), boron (B), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), alumina (Al2O3), and graphite (Gr) were fabricated by powder metallurgy and comparatively evaluated under identical processing and testing conditions. Phase constitution and microstructural characteristics were analyzed by XRD, SEM, and EDS, while mechanical and tribological behavior was assessed by Vickers hardness and dry sliding wear tests. All reinforcements improved the hardness of the Cu matrix compared with unreinforced Cu. The hardness increase followed the order Cu–B4C (68.91%) > Cu–B (66.43%) > Cu–Gr (63.97%) > Cu–Al2O3 (61.79%) > Cu–Cr (42.69%) > Cu–Co (36.04%). Dry sliding wear tests, performed under a 10 N normal load, 0.05 m s−1 sliding speed, and 1000 m sliding distance against a 316L stainless-steel ball, showed that all reinforced composites exhibited lower mass loss and more stable sliding behavior than pure Cu. Among all samples, Cu–B4C displayed the best wear performance, with a 154.8% improvement in wear resistance relative to pure Cu. SEM analysis of the worn surfaces revealed that reinforcement addition reduced severe plastic deformation, groove formation, and delamination, leading to a more stable wear regime. Graphite- and boron-containing composites benefited from interfacial lubrication and contact stabilization, whereas B4C and Al2O3 improved wear resistance through rigid-particle strengthening and enhanced load-bearing capacity. By comparing ceramic, metalloid, metallic, oxide, and solid-lubricating reinforcements at the same low addition level and under identical processing and testing conditions, this study provides a reinforcement-selection framework for Cu-based composites requiring improved hardness and dry-sliding durability.
dc.description.sponsorshipFirat University Research Fund, (FUBAP-TEKF.26.26)
dc.identifier.articlenumber243
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/lubricants14060243
dc.identifier.eissn2075-4442
dc.identifier.issn2075-4442
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105042849864
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/1455
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001805192900001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofLubricants
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectcopper matrix composites
dc.subjectdry sliding wear
dc.subjecthardness
dc.subjectmicrostructure
dc.subjectpowder metallurgy
dc.subjecttribology
dc.subject.classificationEngineering, Mechanical
dc.subject.classificationEngineering
dc.subject.otherAluminum alloys
dc.subject.otherAluminum oxide
dc.subject.otherBearings (machine parts)
dc.subject.otherBoron carbide
dc.subject.otherCeramic materials
dc.subject.otherChromium compounds
dc.subject.otherCopper alloys
dc.subject.otherCopper compounds
dc.subject.otherGraphite
dc.subject.otherMetallic matrix composites
dc.subject.otherParticle reinforced composites
dc.subject.otherPowder metals
dc.subject.otherStabilization
dc.subject.otherStrengthening (metal)
dc.subject.otherVickers hardness
dc.subject.otherVickers hardness testing
dc.subject.otherWear of materials
dc.subject.otherWear resistance
dc.subject.otherCopper matrix composite
dc.subject.otherCu matrix composites
dc.subject.otherDry sliding wear
dc.subject.otherDry sliding wear test
dc.subject.otherElectrical applications
dc.subject.otherMechanical evaluation
dc.subject.otherMicrostructural evaluation
dc.subject.otherProcessing condition
dc.subject.otherTesting conditions
dc.subject.otherTribological evaluations
dc.subject.otherPowder metallurgy
dc.subject.otherTribology
dc.titleComparative Microstructural, Mechanical, and Tribological Evaluation of Cu Matrix Composites Reinforced with B4C, B, Cr, Co, Al2O3, and Graphite via Powder Metallurgy
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex2
rdl.citation.scopus2
rdl.citation.wos2
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4442/14/6/243/pdf?version=1781785261
rdl.scopus.quartileQ2
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)