Latent heat thermal energy storage in a shell-tube design: Impact of metal foam inserts in the heat transfer fluid side

MakaleYalnız künyeScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 7 · Erişilebilir ve Temiz Enerji

Özet

The improvement of heat transfer in latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) system is a crucial task. In the current study, the impact of diverse metal foam (MF) layer arrangements on heat transfer fluid (HTF) within a shell-tube LHTES is explored. Six distinct cases (A-F) with varied MF coverage percentages and layer dimensions were assessed. The local thermal non-equilibrium model was utilized to take into account the PCM and MF temperatures. The finite element method was used for solving the partial differential equations. The impact of MF configurations and inlet pressures (250 Pa, 500 Pa, and 750 Pa) on the thermal energy storage/release was addressed. Cases A-C, featuring a 50 % MF concentration, exhibit shorter melting times than Cases D–F, with decreasing MF concentrations. A higher MF concentration improves the melting process due to increased thermal conductivity and lower thermal resistance on the HTF side. Cases D–F, with a centralized MF layer and decreasing concentrations from 25 % to 6.25 %, display progressively shorter melting times, suggesting that a lower MF concentration leads to more efficient melting. Solidification times also decrease with increasing inlet pressures across all cases. Reynolds numbers, influenced by average HTF tube outlet velocity, vary substantially across cases and inlet pressure differences. Cases A-C demonstrate similar Reynolds numbers for each inlet pressure difference, while Cases D–F show a more pronounced increase in Reynolds numbers as the MF layer is reduced and flow resistance drops. Cases A (50 % MF layer) and F (6.5 % MF layer) provide the quickest charging and discharging times due to their unique combination of MF layer properties and inlet pressures. The study highlights the need to consider MF layer composition and inlet pressure when designing optimal LHTES systems for efficient energy storage/release.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/1703Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.108893Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
11
WoS
10
OpenAlex
11
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorGhalambaz, Mehdi
dc.contributor.authorSheremet, Mikhail
dc.contributor.authorRaizah, Zehba
dc.contributor.authorAkkurt, Nevzat
dc.contributor.authorGhalambaz, Mohammad
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:54:29.876001033Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:54:29.876001033Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractThe improvement of heat transfer in latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) system is a crucial task. In the current study, the impact of diverse metal foam (MF) layer arrangements on heat transfer fluid (HTF) within a shell-tube LHTES is explored. Six distinct cases (A-F) with varied MF coverage percentages and layer dimensions were assessed. The local thermal non-equilibrium model was utilized to take into account the PCM and MF temperatures. The finite element method was used for solving the partial differential equations. The impact of MF configurations and inlet pressures (250 Pa, 500 Pa, and 750 Pa) on the thermal energy storage/release was addressed. Cases A-C, featuring a 50 % MF concentration, exhibit shorter melting times than Cases D–F, with decreasing MF concentrations. A higher MF concentration improves the melting process due to increased thermal conductivity and lower thermal resistance on the HTF side. Cases D–F, with a centralized MF layer and decreasing concentrations from 25 % to 6.25 %, display progressively shorter melting times, suggesting that a lower MF concentration leads to more efficient melting. Solidification times also decrease with increasing inlet pressures across all cases. Reynolds numbers, influenced by average HTF tube outlet velocity, vary substantially across cases and inlet pressure differences. Cases A-C demonstrate similar Reynolds numbers for each inlet pressure difference, while Cases D–F show a more pronounced increase in Reynolds numbers as the MF layer is reduced and flow resistance drops. Cases A (50 % MF layer) and F (6.5 % MF layer) provide the quickest charging and discharging times due to their unique combination of MF layer properties and inlet pressures. The study highlights the need to consider MF layer composition and inlet pressure when designing optimal LHTES systems for efficient energy storage/release.
dc.description.sponsorshipTomsk State University, TSU
dc.description.sponsorshipDeanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University, (RGP.1/505/44)
dc.description.sponsorshipDeanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University
dc.identifier.articlenumber108893
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.est.2023.108893
dc.identifier.eissn2352-1538
dc.identifier.issn2352-152X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85170414687
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/1703
dc.identifier.volume73
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001078374700001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Energy Storage
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectHeat transfer fluid
dc.subjectLatent heat thermal energy storage
dc.subjectMetal foam inserts
dc.subjectPhase change materials
dc.subjectShell-tube
dc.subject.classificationEnergy & Fuels
dc.subject.otherEnergy efficiency
dc.subject.otherHeat storage
dc.subject.otherHeat transfer
dc.subject.otherLatent heat
dc.subject.otherMelting
dc.subject.otherMetal foams
dc.subject.otherReynolds number
dc.subject.otherStorage (materials)
dc.subject.otherThermal conductivity
dc.subject.otherThermal energy
dc.subject.otherFluid sides
dc.subject.otherFoam layers
dc.subject.otherHeat transfer fluids
dc.subject.otherInlet pressures
dc.subject.otherLatent heat thermal energy storage
dc.subject.otherLatent heat thermal energy storage systems
dc.subject.otherMetal foam insert
dc.subject.otherReynold number
dc.subject.otherShell-tube
dc.subject.otherPhase change materials
dc.titleLatent heat thermal energy storage in a shell-tube design: Impact of metal foam inserts in the heat transfer fluid side
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex11
rdl.citation.scopus11
rdl.citation.wos10
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG07
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)