Extension of FEMA and SMUG models with Bayesian best-worst method for disaster risk reduction

MakaleYalnız künyeScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 11 · Sürdürülebilir Şehirler ve Topluluklar

Özet

Turkey is one of the countries that face many natural and man-made disasters. The entire geography of Turkey is affected by these disasters and the secondary disasters resulting from them. Tunceli is located in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey and is a disaster-prone region. Therefore, it is important to carry out an adaptable hazard analysis for the region and support the national disaster risk reduction struggle. In this study, a comprehensive disaster hazard analysis was conducted for Tunceli province, and potential mitigation measures were discussed. As methodological background, FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) and SMUG (Seriousness Manageability Urgency Growth) models, which are well-known methods, were extended under the Bayesian Best-Worst Method (BWM). Bayesian BWM is a pairwise comparison-based multi-criteria decision-making method that takes a probabilistic view of the experts' group decision without losing information, providing less pairwise comparison and higher consistency. Nine different disaster hazards for the Tunceli region are prioritized by the proposed approach. Initially, weights of the risk parameters in FEMA and SMUG and the priority values of disaster hazards based on each parameter were calculated. Then, ranking orders were determined. In addition, more precise evaluations were made for the results obtained with the credal ranking graphs. Some comparative studies were also included in the study to test the solidity of the approach. According to the results, both models showed that the top priority hazard for Tunceli is “earthquake”. Also, flood, mass movement, terrorism, and epidemics are hazards with higher priority to be taken into account. Considering the final preference values of disaster hazards for Tunceli province, the first three hazards for the FEMA model are earthquake with 0.192, mass movement with 0.141 and flood with 0.114, respectively. In the SMUG model, earthquake with 0.194, flood with 0.129 and epidemic disease with 0.120 are in the first three places.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/2418Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102631Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
35
WoS
25
OpenAlex
32
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorYanilmaz, Sumeyye
dc.contributor.authorBaskak, Dilber
dc.contributor.authorYucesan, Melih
dc.contributor.authorGul, Muhammet
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:55:20.938018927Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:55:20.938018927Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractTurkey is one of the countries that face many natural and man-made disasters. The entire geography of Turkey is affected by these disasters and the secondary disasters resulting from them. Tunceli is located in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey and is a disaster-prone region. Therefore, it is important to carry out an adaptable hazard analysis for the region and support the national disaster risk reduction struggle. In this study, a comprehensive disaster hazard analysis was conducted for Tunceli province, and potential mitigation measures were discussed. As methodological background, FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) and SMUG (Seriousness Manageability Urgency Growth) models, which are well-known methods, were extended under the Bayesian Best-Worst Method (BWM). Bayesian BWM is a pairwise comparison-based multi-criteria decision-making method that takes a probabilistic view of the experts' group decision without losing information, providing less pairwise comparison and higher consistency. Nine different disaster hazards for the Tunceli region are prioritized by the proposed approach. Initially, weights of the risk parameters in FEMA and SMUG and the priority values of disaster hazards based on each parameter were calculated. Then, ranking orders were determined. In addition, more precise evaluations were made for the results obtained with the credal ranking graphs. Some comparative studies were also included in the study to test the solidity of the approach. According to the results, both models showed that the top priority hazard for Tunceli is “earthquake”. Also, flood, mass movement, terrorism, and epidemics are hazards with higher priority to be taken into account. Considering the final preference values of disaster hazards for Tunceli province, the first three hazards for the FEMA model are earthquake with 0.192, mass movement with 0.141 and flood with 0.114, respectively. In the SMUG model, earthquake with 0.194, flood with 0.129 and epidemic disease with 0.120 are in the first three places.
dc.identifier.articlenumber102631
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102631
dc.identifier.issn2212-4209
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85117303394
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/2418
dc.identifier.volume66
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000711060300003
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectBayesian best-worst method
dc.subjectDisaster risk reduction
dc.subjectFEMA
dc.subjectHazard prioritization
dc.subjectSMUG
dc.subject.classificationGeosciences, Multidisciplinary
dc.subject.classificationMeteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
dc.subject.classificationWater Resources
dc.subject.classificationGeology
dc.subject.otherMULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
dc.subject.otherVULNERABILITY
dc.subject.otherGIS
dc.titleExtension of FEMA and SMUG models with Bayesian best-worst method for disaster risk reduction
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex32
rdl.citation.scopus35
rdl.citation.wos25
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG11
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)