Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Yazarlar
Yayınlar
- Kitap BölümüYalnız künye2025Bayesian Best–Worst Method Application for Assessing the Potential Effecting Areas of Climate Change: A Case Study in Turkey
Konurhan, Zekeriya; Yücesan, Melih; Gul, Muhammet
‘Climate Change’ is a term used to refer to global changes in the Earth's average temperature and the consequences of changes in temperature. More clearly, it demonstrates changes in temperature and weather patterns over time. The emergence of this situation directly or indirectly affects irreparable damages and major/minor disasters in many areas. Determining the answer to the question of which of these areas has an impact at what level of importance will provide guidance on which one should be prioritized in carrying out an effective treatment. Therefore, in this study, this problem is ad-dressed as a multi-criteria decision problem using Bayesian Best–Worst Method. The potential impacts have been categorized under 8 main areas and weighted via participating of 8 competent experts (geography, emergency disaster management, geomorphologist, climate scientist etc.) in the field of climate change. The study results determined that B (Ecosystems and Water Resources) has the most critical impact area, with 0.200. The least essential domain is G4 (Adaptation and Resilience Strategies in the Tourism Industry), which weighs 0.012. The results showed that they provide important clues regarding which impacts should be addressed first.
- MakaleAçık Erişim2025Scopus SJRQ1Selection of the central composting facility for organic wastes through the Bayesian best worst method and Geographic information system incorporation: The case of Istanbul
Güler, Mustafa; Samastı, Mesut; Yücesan, Melih; Gül, Muhammet; Çelik, Erkan; Ciner, Miraç Nur; Algorabi, Ömer
The rapid increase in municipal solid waste (MSW) generation, driven by population growth and unplanned urbanization, has made the location of organic waste collection and disposal facilities a critical issue for metropolitan cities. Improper waste management practices threaten environmental sustainability, human health, and urban futures. This study applies multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to identify the optimal placement for a central composting facility in Istanbul. A novel MCDM mechanism was developed, building on existing methods and addressing a gap in the literature. While determining the criteria, academic studies on this subject were researched in depth and the criteria used in these studies were brought together to obtain 28 criteria. The study assessed 28 criteria using the Bayesian Best-Worst Method (BWM) to determine their relative importance. These weights were then integrated into a Geographic Information System (GIS) to produce a suitability map, highlighting the most appropriate locations for the facility. Based on this analysis, the Çatalca Karacabey region was identified as the optimal site, ensuring reduced environmental impact and improved efficiency in organic waste management. The study contributes both theoretically and practically to the field, offering a robust framework for sustainable waste facility siting and providing actionable insights for urban governance. The study provides valuable insights for facility siting and urban governance, while highlighting areas for future research.
AtıfScopus5WoS4
İncele - BildiriYalnız künye2024Scopus SJRQ4Constructing the Criteria in Determining the Product Groups for Agriculture 4.0 Applications
Erdoğan, Melike; Konurhan, Zekeriya; Yücesan, Melih; Gül, Muhammet; Mirzazadeh, A.; Molamohamadi, Z.; Erdebilli, B.; Babaee Tirkolaee, E.; Weber, G.-W.
With Agriculture 4.0, the use of techniques such as sensors, robots, artificial intelligence, and machine learning in agriculture has started. It is aimed to increase productivity in agriculture by reducing food loss and waste through Agriculture 4.0. It is a critical decision to determine which products should be handled first for Turkey to benefit from the advantages of Agriculture 4.0 as soon as possible compared to developed countries in the field of agriculture. At this point, the problem of which factors should be addressed in the determination of product & product groups arises. To handle this, in this study, a multi-criteria analysis has been applied to prioritize the factors that should be considered in the determination of the critical fruit and vegetable group for export, which should be considered as a priority within the scope of Agriculture 4.0. In this context, a multi-criteria analysis has been carried out by adopting the Bayesian Best Worst Method BWM (B-BWM), which is an improved version of a pairwise comparison-based BWM method and applied to group decisions. As a result of the analysis, the most important and least important criteria to be used in determining which products or product groups are more suitable for Agriculture 4.0 applications in Turkey and which should be invested in priority have been determined.