Comparative Microstructural, Mechanical, and Tribological Evaluation of Cu Matrix Composites Reinforced with B4C, B, Cr, Co, Al2O3, and Graphite via Powder Metallurgy
Özet
Copper and its alloys are widely used in electrical, automotive, aerospace, and energy applications because of their excellent thermal and electrical conductivity. However, the low hardness and poor wear resistance of pure Cu limit its use under tribologically demanding sliding conditions. In this study, Cu matrix composites reinforced with 1 wt.% boron carbide (B4C), boron (B), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), alumina (Al2O3), and graphite (Gr) were fabricated by powder metallurgy and comparatively evaluated under identical processing and testing conditions. Phase constitution and microstructural characteristics were analyzed by XRD, SEM, and EDS, while mechanical and tribological behavior was assessed by Vickers hardness and dry sliding wear tests. All reinforcements improved the hardness of the Cu matrix compared with unreinforced Cu. The hardness increase followed the order Cu–B4C (68.91%) > Cu–B (66.43%) > Cu–Gr (63.97%) > Cu–Al2O3 (61.79%) > Cu–Cr (42.69%) > Cu–Co (36.04%). Dry sliding wear tests, performed under a 10 N normal load, 0.05 m s−1 sliding speed, and 1000 m sliding distance against a 316L stainless-steel ball, showed that all reinforced composites exhibited lower mass loss and more stable sliding behavior than pure Cu. Among all samples, Cu–B4C displayed the best wear performance, with a 154.8% improvement in wear resistance relative to pure Cu. SEM analysis of the worn surfaces revealed that reinforcement addition reduced severe plastic deformation, groove formation, and delamination, leading to a more stable wear regime. Graphite- and boron-containing composites benefited from interfacial lubrication and contact stabilization, whereas B4C and Al2O3 improved wear resistance through rigid-particle strengthening and enhanced load-bearing capacity. By comparing ceramic, metalloid, metallic, oxide, and solid-lubricating reinforcements at the same low addition level and under identical processing and testing conditions, this study provides a reinforcement-selection framework for Cu-based composites requiring improved hardness and dry-sliding durability.
Anahtar Kelimeler
- Scopus
- 2
- WoS
- 2
- OpenAlex
- 2
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Macit, Cevher Kursat | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gürgenç, Turan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aksakal, Bunyamin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aslan, Naim | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-28T14:54:13.648324265Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-28T14:54:13.648324265Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Copper and its alloys are widely used in electrical, automotive, aerospace, and energy applications because of their excellent thermal and electrical conductivity. However, the low hardness and poor wear resistance of pure Cu limit its use under tribologically demanding sliding conditions. In this study, Cu matrix composites reinforced with 1 wt.% boron carbide (B4C), boron (B), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), alumina (Al2O3), and graphite (Gr) were fabricated by powder metallurgy and comparatively evaluated under identical processing and testing conditions. Phase constitution and microstructural characteristics were analyzed by XRD, SEM, and EDS, while mechanical and tribological behavior was assessed by Vickers hardness and dry sliding wear tests. All reinforcements improved the hardness of the Cu matrix compared with unreinforced Cu. The hardness increase followed the order Cu–B4C (68.91%) > Cu–B (66.43%) > Cu–Gr (63.97%) > Cu–Al2O3 (61.79%) > Cu–Cr (42.69%) > Cu–Co (36.04%). Dry sliding wear tests, performed under a 10 N normal load, 0.05 m s−1 sliding speed, and 1000 m sliding distance against a 316L stainless-steel ball, showed that all reinforced composites exhibited lower mass loss and more stable sliding behavior than pure Cu. Among all samples, Cu–B4C displayed the best wear performance, with a 154.8% improvement in wear resistance relative to pure Cu. SEM analysis of the worn surfaces revealed that reinforcement addition reduced severe plastic deformation, groove formation, and delamination, leading to a more stable wear regime. Graphite- and boron-containing composites benefited from interfacial lubrication and contact stabilization, whereas B4C and Al2O3 improved wear resistance through rigid-particle strengthening and enhanced load-bearing capacity. By comparing ceramic, metalloid, metallic, oxide, and solid-lubricating reinforcements at the same low addition level and under identical processing and testing conditions, this study provides a reinforcement-selection framework for Cu-based composites requiring improved hardness and dry-sliding durability. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Firat University Research Fund, (FUBAP-TEKF.26.26) | |
| dc.identifier.articlenumber | 243 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/lubricants14060243 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2075-4442 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2075-4442 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105042849864 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/1455 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 14 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001805192900001 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Lubricants | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | copper matrix composites | |
| dc.subject | dry sliding wear | |
| dc.subject | hardness | |
| dc.subject | microstructure | |
| dc.subject | powder metallurgy | |
| dc.subject | tribology | |
| dc.subject.classification | Engineering, Mechanical | |
| dc.subject.classification | Engineering | |
| dc.subject.other | Aluminum alloys | |
| dc.subject.other | Aluminum oxide | |
| dc.subject.other | Bearings (machine parts) | |
| dc.subject.other | Boron carbide | |
| dc.subject.other | Ceramic materials | |
| dc.subject.other | Chromium compounds | |
| dc.subject.other | Copper alloys | |
| dc.subject.other | Copper compounds | |
| dc.subject.other | Graphite | |
| dc.subject.other | Metallic matrix composites | |
| dc.subject.other | Particle reinforced composites | |
| dc.subject.other | Powder metals | |
| dc.subject.other | Stabilization | |
| dc.subject.other | Strengthening (metal) | |
| dc.subject.other | Vickers hardness | |
| dc.subject.other | Vickers hardness testing | |
| dc.subject.other | Wear of materials | |
| dc.subject.other | Wear resistance | |
| dc.subject.other | Copper matrix composite | |
| dc.subject.other | Cu matrix composites | |
| dc.subject.other | Dry sliding wear | |
| dc.subject.other | Dry sliding wear test | |
| dc.subject.other | Electrical applications | |
| dc.subject.other | Mechanical evaluation | |
| dc.subject.other | Microstructural evaluation | |
| dc.subject.other | Processing condition | |
| dc.subject.other | Testing conditions | |
| dc.subject.other | Tribological evaluations | |
| dc.subject.other | Powder metallurgy | |
| dc.subject.other | Tribology | |
| dc.title | Comparative Microstructural, Mechanical, and Tribological Evaluation of Cu Matrix Composites Reinforced with B4C, B, Cr, Co, Al2O3, and Graphite via Powder Metallurgy | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| rdl.citation.openalex | 2 | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 2 | |
| rdl.citation.wos | 2 | |
| rdl.oa.status | gold | |
| rdl.oa.url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4442/14/6/243/pdf?version=1781785261 | |
| rdl.scopus.quartile | Q2 | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS | |
| rdl.source.index | WOS | |
| rdl.wos.index | Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |
