Leachate treatment via electrocoagulation–coal-based powdered activated carbon process: Efficiencies, mechanisms, kinetics, and costs
Özet
This study aims to improve COD, NH3-N, and turbidity removal from Bingöl's leachate using a single-reactor integrated electrocoagulation (EC)–coal-based powdered activated carbon (CBPAC) process under various experimental conditions. In the EC-CBPAC process, three stainless-steel cathodes and three aluminum electrodes were connected to the negative and positive terminals of the power supply, respectively. The initial concentrations in the leachate were 1044 mg O2/L for COD, 204 mg/L for NH3-N, and 57 NTU (or 71.25-mg (NH2)2H2SO4/L) for turbidity, respectively. After a 40-min EC-CBPAC process, with a CBPAC dosage of 5 g/L and pH of 5 for COD and turbidity, and 9.5 for NH3-N, the optimum removal efficiencies for COD, NH3-N, and turbidity were achieved at 92%, 40%, and 91%, respectively. When the EC process was applied without CBPAC under the same experimental conditions, the removal efficiencies of COD, NH3-N, and turbidity were 87%, 28%, and 54%, respectively. Before and after the EC-CBPAC process, the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area, pore volume, and mean pore diameter of the CBPAC were found to be (888 m2/g, 0.498 cm3/g, and 22.28 Å) and (173 m2/g, 0.18 cm3/g, and 42.8 Å), respectively. The optimum pseudo-first-order (PFO) rate constants for COD, turbidity, and NH3-N were determined to be 3.15 × 10−2, 4.77 × 10−2, and 8.8 × 10−3 min−1, respectively. With the current density increasing from 15 to 25 mA/cm2, energy consumption, unit energy consumption, and total cost increased from 68.7 to 122.4 kWh/m3, 6.948 to 15.226 kWh/kg COD, and 0.85 to 1.838 $/kg COD, respectively. Practitioner points: EC-CBPAC process has greater COD, NH3-N, and turbidity removal efficiency than EC process. COD and turbidity achieved their optimum disposal efficiencies at 92% and 91%, respectively, at pH 5 The most efficient disposal efficiency for NH3-N was observed to be 40% at pH 9.5. EC-CBPAC process increased removal efficiencies for COD, NH3-N, and turbidity by 20%, 19%, and 38%, respectively, compared with EC alone. The turbidity, NH3-N, and COD disposal fitted PSO model due to high correlation values (R2 0.94–0.99).
Anahtar Kelimeler
- Scopus
- 3
- WoS
- 3
- OpenAlex
- 3
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Ogedey, Aysenur | |
| dc.contributor.author | Oguz, Ensar | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-28T14:55:09.464704028Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-28T14:55:09.464704028Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to improve COD, NH3-N, and turbidity removal from Bingöl's leachate using a single-reactor integrated electrocoagulation (EC)–coal-based powdered activated carbon (CBPAC) process under various experimental conditions. In the EC-CBPAC process, three stainless-steel cathodes and three aluminum electrodes were connected to the negative and positive terminals of the power supply, respectively. The initial concentrations in the leachate were 1044 mg O2/L for COD, 204 mg/L for NH3-N, and 57 NTU (or 71.25-mg (NH2)2H2SO4/L) for turbidity, respectively. After a 40-min EC-CBPAC process, with a CBPAC dosage of 5 g/L and pH of 5 for COD and turbidity, and 9.5 for NH3-N, the optimum removal efficiencies for COD, NH3-N, and turbidity were achieved at 92%, 40%, and 91%, respectively. When the EC process was applied without CBPAC under the same experimental conditions, the removal efficiencies of COD, NH3-N, and turbidity were 87%, 28%, and 54%, respectively. Before and after the EC-CBPAC process, the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area, pore volume, and mean pore diameter of the CBPAC were found to be (888 m2/g, 0.498 cm3/g, and 22.28 Å) and (173 m2/g, 0.18 cm3/g, and 42.8 Å), respectively. The optimum pseudo-first-order (PFO) rate constants for COD, turbidity, and NH3-N were determined to be 3.15 × 10−2, 4.77 × 10−2, and 8.8 × 10−3 min−1, respectively. With the current density increasing from 15 to 25 mA/cm2, energy consumption, unit energy consumption, and total cost increased from 68.7 to 122.4 kWh/m3, 6.948 to 15.226 kWh/kg COD, and 0.85 to 1.838 $/kg COD, respectively. Practitioner points: EC-CBPAC process has greater COD, NH3-N, and turbidity removal efficiency than EC process. COD and turbidity achieved their optimum disposal efficiencies at 92% and 91%, respectively, at pH 5 The most efficient disposal efficiency for NH3-N was observed to be 40% at pH 9.5. EC-CBPAC process increased removal efficiencies for COD, NH3-N, and turbidity by 20%, 19%, and 38%, respectively, compared with EC alone. The turbidity, NH3-N, and COD disposal fitted PSO model due to high correlation values (R2 0.94–0.99). | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, TÜBİTAK | |
| dc.identifier.articlenumber | e11060 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/wer.11060 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1554-7531 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1061-4303 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 38847129 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85195392628 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/2262 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 96 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001240840200001 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Water Environment Research | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | COD | |
| dc.subject | electrocoagulation | |
| dc.subject | integrated process | |
| dc.subject | leachate | |
| dc.subject | NH<sub>3</sub>-N | |
| dc.subject.classification | Engineering, Environmental | |
| dc.subject.classification | Environmental Sciences | |
| dc.subject.classification | Limnology | |
| dc.subject.classification | Water Resources | |
| dc.subject.classification | Engineering | |
| dc.subject.classification | Environmental Sciences & Ecology | |
| dc.subject.classification | Marine & Freshwater Biology | |
| dc.subject.other | Charcoal | |
| dc.subject.other | Kinetics | |
| dc.subject.other | Waste Disposal, Fluid | |
| dc.subject.other | Water Pollutants, Chemical | |
| dc.subject.other | Water Purification | |
| dc.subject.other | Activated carbon | |
| dc.subject.other | Ammonia | |
| dc.subject.other | Coagulation | |
| dc.subject.other | Coal | |
| dc.subject.other | Electrodes | |
| dc.subject.other | Energy utilization | |
| dc.subject.other | Leaching | |
| dc.subject.other | Rate constants | |
| dc.subject.other | aluminum | |
| dc.subject.other | electrolyte | |
| dc.subject.other | stainless steel | |
| dc.subject.other | COD | |
| dc.subject.other | Electro coagulations | |
| dc.subject.other | Energy-consumption | |
| dc.subject.other | Experimental conditions | |
| dc.subject.other | Integrated process | |
| dc.subject.other | Leachates | |
| dc.subject.other | N removal | |
| dc.subject.other | NH3-N | |
| dc.subject.other | Powdered activated carbon | |
| dc.subject.other | Removal efficiencies | |
| dc.subject.other | chemical oxygen demand | |
| dc.subject.other | concentration (composition) | |
| dc.subject.other | electrochemistry | |
| dc.subject.other | integrated approach | |
| dc.subject.other | leachate | |
| dc.subject.other | pollutant removal | |
| dc.subject.other | turbidity | |
| dc.subject.other | wastewater treatment | |
| dc.subject.other | Article | |
| dc.subject.other | biochemical oxygen demand | |
| dc.subject.other | Brunauer Emmett Teller method | |
| dc.subject.other | chemical interaction | |
| dc.subject.other | conductance | |
| dc.subject.other | controlled study | |
| dc.subject.other | cost | |
| dc.subject.other | current density | |
| dc.subject.other | electrocoagulation | |
| dc.subject.other | energy consumption | |
| dc.subject.other | hydrodynamics | |
| dc.subject.other | pH | |
| dc.subject.other | pore size | |
| dc.subject.other | pore volume | |
| dc.subject.other | power supply | |
| dc.subject.other | surface area | |
| dc.subject.other | temperature | |
| dc.subject.other | waste water recycling | |
| dc.subject.other | wastewater | |
| dc.subject.other | zeta potential | |
| dc.subject.other | chemistry | |
| dc.subject.other | procedures | |
| dc.subject.other | sewage | |
| dc.subject.other | water management | |
| dc.subject.other | water pollutant | |
| dc.title | Leachate treatment via electrocoagulation–coal-based powdered activated carbon process: Efficiencies, mechanisms, kinetics, and costs | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| rdl.citation.openalex | 3 | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 3 | |
| rdl.citation.wos | 3 | |
| rdl.department | Civil Engineering Department, Munzur University, Tunceli, Turkey | |
| rdl.department | Environmental Engineering Department, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey | |
| rdl.oa.status | hybrid | |
| rdl.oa.url | https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.11060 | |
| rdl.scopus.quartile | Q2 | |
| rdl.sdg | SDG06 | |
| rdl.sdg | SDG12 | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS | |
| rdl.source.index | WOS | |
| rdl.source.index | PUBMED | |
| rdl.wos.index | Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |


