Leachate treatment via electrocoagulation–coal-based powdered activated carbon process: Efficiencies, mechanisms, kinetics, and costs

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ2
  • SDG 6 · Temiz Su ve Sanitasyon
  • SDG 12 · Sorumlu Üretim ve Tüketim

Özet

This study aims to improve COD, NH3-N, and turbidity removal from Bingöl's leachate using a single-reactor integrated electrocoagulation (EC)–coal-based powdered activated carbon (CBPAC) process under various experimental conditions. In the EC-CBPAC process, three stainless-steel cathodes and three aluminum electrodes were connected to the negative and positive terminals of the power supply, respectively. The initial concentrations in the leachate were 1044 mg O2/L for COD, 204 mg/L for NH3-N, and 57 NTU (or 71.25-mg (NH2)2H2SO4/L) for turbidity, respectively. After a 40-min EC-CBPAC process, with a CBPAC dosage of 5 g/L and pH of 5 for COD and turbidity, and 9.5 for NH3-N, the optimum removal efficiencies for COD, NH3-N, and turbidity were achieved at 92%, 40%, and 91%, respectively. When the EC process was applied without CBPAC under the same experimental conditions, the removal efficiencies of COD, NH3-N, and turbidity were 87%, 28%, and 54%, respectively. Before and after the EC-CBPAC process, the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area, pore volume, and mean pore diameter of the CBPAC were found to be (888 m2/g, 0.498 cm3/g, and 22.28 Å) and (173 m2/g, 0.18 cm3/g, and 42.8 Å), respectively. The optimum pseudo-first-order (PFO) rate constants for COD, turbidity, and NH3-N were determined to be 3.15 × 10−2, 4.77 × 10−2, and 8.8 × 10−3 min−1, respectively. With the current density increasing from 15 to 25 mA/cm2, energy consumption, unit energy consumption, and total cost increased from 68.7 to 122.4 kWh/m3, 6.948 to 15.226 kWh/kg COD, and 0.85 to 1.838 $/kg COD, respectively. Practitioner points: EC-CBPAC process has greater COD, NH3-N, and turbidity removal efficiency than EC process. COD and turbidity achieved their optimum disposal efficiencies at 92% and 91%, respectively, at pH 5 The most efficient disposal efficiency for NH3-N was observed to be 40% at pH 9.5. EC-CBPAC process increased removal efficiencies for COD, NH3-N, and turbidity by 20%, 19%, and 38%, respectively, compared with EC alone. The turbidity, NH3-N, and COD disposal fitted PSO model due to high correlation values (R2 0.94–0.99).

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/2262Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.11060Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
3
WoS
3
OpenAlex
3
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorOgedey, Aysenur
dc.contributor.authorOguz, Ensar
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:55:09.464704028Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:55:09.464704028Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to improve COD, NH3-N, and turbidity removal from Bingöl's leachate using a single-reactor integrated electrocoagulation (EC)–coal-based powdered activated carbon (CBPAC) process under various experimental conditions. In the EC-CBPAC process, three stainless-steel cathodes and three aluminum electrodes were connected to the negative and positive terminals of the power supply, respectively. The initial concentrations in the leachate were 1044 mg O2/L for COD, 204 mg/L for NH3-N, and 57 NTU (or 71.25-mg (NH2)2H2SO4/L) for turbidity, respectively. After a 40-min EC-CBPAC process, with a CBPAC dosage of 5 g/L and pH of 5 for COD and turbidity, and 9.5 for NH3-N, the optimum removal efficiencies for COD, NH3-N, and turbidity were achieved at 92%, 40%, and 91%, respectively. When the EC process was applied without CBPAC under the same experimental conditions, the removal efficiencies of COD, NH3-N, and turbidity were 87%, 28%, and 54%, respectively. Before and after the EC-CBPAC process, the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area, pore volume, and mean pore diameter of the CBPAC were found to be (888 m2/g, 0.498 cm3/g, and 22.28 Å) and (173 m2/g, 0.18 cm3/g, and 42.8 Å), respectively. The optimum pseudo-first-order (PFO) rate constants for COD, turbidity, and NH3-N were determined to be 3.15 × 10−2, 4.77 × 10−2, and 8.8 × 10−3 min−1, respectively. With the current density increasing from 15 to 25 mA/cm2, energy consumption, unit energy consumption, and total cost increased from 68.7 to 122.4 kWh/m3, 6.948 to 15.226 kWh/kg COD, and 0.85 to 1.838 $/kg COD, respectively. Practitioner points: EC-CBPAC process has greater COD, NH3-N, and turbidity removal efficiency than EC process. COD and turbidity achieved their optimum disposal efficiencies at 92% and 91%, respectively, at pH 5 The most efficient disposal efficiency for NH3-N was observed to be 40% at pH 9.5. EC-CBPAC process increased removal efficiencies for COD, NH3-N, and turbidity by 20%, 19%, and 38%, respectively, compared with EC alone. The turbidity, NH3-N, and COD disposal fitted PSO model due to high correlation values (R2 0.94–0.99).
dc.description.sponsorshipTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, TÜBİTAK
dc.identifier.articlenumbere11060
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/wer.11060
dc.identifier.eissn1554-7531
dc.identifier.issn1061-4303
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid38847129
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85195392628
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/2262
dc.identifier.volume96
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001240840200001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc
dc.relation.ispartofWater Environment Research
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCOD
dc.subjectelectrocoagulation
dc.subjectintegrated process
dc.subjectleachate
dc.subjectNH<sub>3</sub>-N
dc.subject.classificationEngineering, Environmental
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Sciences
dc.subject.classificationLimnology
dc.subject.classificationWater Resources
dc.subject.classificationEngineering
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.subject.classificationMarine & Freshwater Biology
dc.subject.otherCharcoal
dc.subject.otherKinetics
dc.subject.otherWaste Disposal, Fluid
dc.subject.otherWater Pollutants, Chemical
dc.subject.otherWater Purification
dc.subject.otherActivated carbon
dc.subject.otherAmmonia
dc.subject.otherCoagulation
dc.subject.otherCoal
dc.subject.otherElectrodes
dc.subject.otherEnergy utilization
dc.subject.otherLeaching
dc.subject.otherRate constants
dc.subject.otheraluminum
dc.subject.otherelectrolyte
dc.subject.otherstainless steel
dc.subject.otherCOD
dc.subject.otherElectro coagulations
dc.subject.otherEnergy-consumption
dc.subject.otherExperimental conditions
dc.subject.otherIntegrated process
dc.subject.otherLeachates
dc.subject.otherN removal
dc.subject.otherNH3-N
dc.subject.otherPowdered activated carbon
dc.subject.otherRemoval efficiencies
dc.subject.otherchemical oxygen demand
dc.subject.otherconcentration (composition)
dc.subject.otherelectrochemistry
dc.subject.otherintegrated approach
dc.subject.otherleachate
dc.subject.otherpollutant removal
dc.subject.otherturbidity
dc.subject.otherwastewater treatment
dc.subject.otherArticle
dc.subject.otherbiochemical oxygen demand
dc.subject.otherBrunauer Emmett Teller method
dc.subject.otherchemical interaction
dc.subject.otherconductance
dc.subject.othercontrolled study
dc.subject.othercost
dc.subject.othercurrent density
dc.subject.otherelectrocoagulation
dc.subject.otherenergy consumption
dc.subject.otherhydrodynamics
dc.subject.otherpH
dc.subject.otherpore size
dc.subject.otherpore volume
dc.subject.otherpower supply
dc.subject.othersurface area
dc.subject.othertemperature
dc.subject.otherwaste water recycling
dc.subject.otherwastewater
dc.subject.otherzeta potential
dc.subject.otherchemistry
dc.subject.otherprocedures
dc.subject.othersewage
dc.subject.otherwater management
dc.subject.otherwater pollutant
dc.titleLeachate treatment via electrocoagulation–coal-based powdered activated carbon process: Efficiencies, mechanisms, kinetics, and costs
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex3
rdl.citation.scopus3
rdl.citation.wos3
rdl.departmentCivil Engineering Department, Munzur University, Tunceli, Turkey
rdl.departmentEnvironmental Engineering Department, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
rdl.oa.statushybrid
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1002/wer.11060
rdl.scopus.quartileQ2
rdl.sdgSDG06
rdl.sdgSDG12
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)