Assessment of the combined in-plane and out-of-plane behavior of brick infill walls within reinforced concrete frames under seismic loading

MakaleYalnız künyeScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 9 · Sanayi, Yenilikçilik ve Altyapı

Özet

Understanding the out-of-plane response of masonry infill walls and preventing their progressive collapse mechanisms is very important for earthquake-prone countries to prevent loss of life and economic loss. In fact, having a realistic collapse mechanism assessment allows suitable prevention measures to be adopted. With this purpose in mind, two full-scale one-bay one-story substructures of reinforced concrete frames (RCF) with infill walls were tested on a shake table. These 2 specimens were designed to represent the response of a typical RC Frame at the fifth floor of an 8-story building, namely the out-of-plane failure of its infill wall under combined bidirectional seismic load. Both specimens were composed of a single-leaf clay brick infill wall surrounded by the RC Frame. However, while the first specimen corresponds to an unreinforced masonry configuration, the second specimen includes horizontal bed joint reinforcement as a strengthening/retrofitting technique. The main novelty of this study is the application of a bidirectional and simultaneous dynamic loading to the specimen, such that in-plane and out-of-plane effects are evaluated together. This work presents several interesting experimental results, with particular emphasis on the bearing capacity of the specimens against out-of-plane failure. As expected, the in-plane capacity of the reinforced infill specimen is larger than that of the unreinforced infill specimen. Nevertheless, the out-of-plane bearing capacities of the two specimens are very similar, in contrast to their ductility capacity, which is significantly increased in the reinforced masonry specimen. The capacities of the two specimens for both in-plane and out-of-plane directions, as predicted by formulations in the literature, are given. The differences found between these calculations and the results of the tests are discussed, and may possibly be explained by the parameters considered in the different formulations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/3474Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3111Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
49
OpenAlex
44
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorOnat, Onur
dc.contributor.authorCorreia, António A.
dc.contributor.authorLourenço, Paulo B.
dc.contributor.authorKoçak, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:56:41.176031709Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:56:41.176031709Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding the out-of-plane response of masonry infill walls and preventing their progressive collapse mechanisms is very important for earthquake-prone countries to prevent loss of life and economic loss. In fact, having a realistic collapse mechanism assessment allows suitable prevention measures to be adopted. With this purpose in mind, two full-scale one-bay one-story substructures of reinforced concrete frames (RCF) with infill walls were tested on a shake table. These 2 specimens were designed to represent the response of a typical RC Frame at the fifth floor of an 8-story building, namely the out-of-plane failure of its infill wall under combined bidirectional seismic load. Both specimens were composed of a single-leaf clay brick infill wall surrounded by the RC Frame. However, while the first specimen corresponds to an unreinforced masonry configuration, the second specimen includes horizontal bed joint reinforcement as a strengthening/retrofitting technique. The main novelty of this study is the application of a bidirectional and simultaneous dynamic loading to the specimen, such that in-plane and out-of-plane effects are evaluated together. This work presents several interesting experimental results, with particular emphasis on the bearing capacity of the specimens against out-of-plane failure. As expected, the in-plane capacity of the reinforced infill specimen is larger than that of the unreinforced infill specimen. Nevertheless, the out-of-plane bearing capacities of the two specimens are very similar, in contrast to their ductility capacity, which is significantly increased in the reinforced masonry specimen. The capacities of the two specimens for both in-plane and out-of-plane directions, as predicted by formulations in the literature, are given. The differences found between these calculations and the results of the tests are discussed, and may possibly be explained by the parameters considered in the different formulations.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/eqe.3111
dc.identifier.eissn1096-9845
dc.identifier.endpage2839
dc.identifier.issn0098-8847
dc.identifier.issue14
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85053380677
dc.identifier.startpage2821
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/3474
dc.identifier.volume47
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000446828400005
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofEarthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectbrick infill wall
dc.subjectearthquake
dc.subjectout-of-plane behavior
dc.subjectreinforced concrete
dc.subjectshake table experiment
dc.subject.otherBearing capacity
dc.subject.otherBrick
dc.subject.otherDynamic loads
dc.subject.otherEarthquakes
dc.subject.otherLosses
dc.subject.otherReinforced concrete
dc.subject.otherWalls (structural partitions)
dc.subject.otherInfill walls
dc.subject.otherOut-of plane
dc.subject.otherOut-of-plane direction
dc.subject.otherOut-of-plane failures
dc.subject.otherOut-of-plane response
dc.subject.otherProgressive collapse mechanisms
dc.subject.otherReinforced concrete frames
dc.subject.otherShake table experiments
dc.subject.otherearthquake engineering
dc.subject.otherinfill
dc.subject.otherloading
dc.subject.otherseismic response
dc.subject.othershaking table test
dc.subject.otherstructural component
dc.subject.otherwall
dc.subject.otherInfill drilling
dc.titleAssessment of the combined in-plane and out-of-plane behavior of brick infill walls within reinforced concrete frames under seismic loading
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex44
rdl.citation.scopus49
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG09
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS