Empirical modeling between degree days and optimum insulation thickness for external wall

MakaleYalnız künyeScopus SJRQ2
  • SDG 7 · Erişilebilir ve Temiz Enerji
  • SDG 13 · İklim Eylemi

Özet

Insulating is the most effective method that is used to save energy in buildings. Samples from cities from different climatic zones from TS 825 (Turkey) first. Optimum insulation thickness (xopt) analysis is based on two types of insulating and four different fuels (natural gas, coal, fuel oil and electric) of related cities. Cost accounts, payback period and CO2-SO2 emission calculations were performed based on these analyses. Second of all, the relationship between a number of degree day (NDD) and optimum insulation thickness (xopt) was developed by linear, quadratic and cubic correlations. Thirty different mathematical correlations based on different fuel types by using XPS and EPS insulating materials. Twenty-four of these models that were developed were generated peculiar to the fuel type; six of them were generated based on average insulation thickness. R2 values of related correlations are between 0.9989 most and 0.9952 at least as well as it is pretty close to (R ≤ 1) one value. The model among these models is the xopt xopt = a+b (NDD) + c(NDD)2+ d(NDD)3 cubic mathematical model that gives the best average value. a = 0.0036, b = 5E-05, c =–7E-09 and d = 6E-13 are the values for XPS material. Following values are for EPS material; a = 0.0028, b = 5E-13, c =–7E-09 and d = 4E-05. R2 determination coefficient of both two equations is pretty close to 0.9989 and 1; the models obtained are less-than-stellar. Optimum insulation thickness of the area can be known based on the type of material via the number of degree day without the need for long analyses. According to the R2 values, the use of all models is recommended for academic and industrial users.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/3801Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
21
WoS
24
OpenAlex
22
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKallioğlu, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Umut
dc.contributor.authorAvcı, Ali Serkan
dc.contributor.authorFidan, Cihad
dc.contributor.authorKarakaya, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:57:08.633444672Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:57:08.633444672Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractInsulating is the most effective method that is used to save energy in buildings. Samples from cities from different climatic zones from TS 825 (Turkey) first. Optimum insulation thickness (xopt) analysis is based on two types of insulating and four different fuels (natural gas, coal, fuel oil and electric) of related cities. Cost accounts, payback period and CO2-SO2 emission calculations were performed based on these analyses. Second of all, the relationship between a number of degree day (NDD) and optimum insulation thickness (xopt) was developed by linear, quadratic and cubic correlations. Thirty different mathematical correlations based on different fuel types by using XPS and EPS insulating materials. Twenty-four of these models that were developed were generated peculiar to the fuel type; six of them were generated based on average insulation thickness. R2 values of related correlations are between 0.9989 most and 0.9952 at least as well as it is pretty close to (R ≤ 1) one value. The model among these models is the xopt xopt = a+b (NDD) + c(NDD)2+ d(NDD)3 cubic mathematical model that gives the best average value. a = 0.0036, b = 5E-05, c =–7E-09 and d = 6E-13 are the values for XPS material. Following values are for EPS material; a = 0.0028, b = 5E-13, c =–7E-09 and d = 4E-05. R2 determination coefficient of both two equations is pretty close to 0.9989 and 1; the models obtained are less-than-stellar. Optimum insulation thickness of the area can be known based on the type of material via the number of degree day without the need for long analyses. According to the R2 values, the use of all models is recommended for academic and industrial users.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15567036.2019.1651797
dc.identifier.eissn1556-7230
dc.identifier.endpage1334
dc.identifier.issn1556-7036
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85070526416
dc.identifier.startpage1314
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/3801
dc.identifier.volume42
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000480906300001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectclimate zones
dc.subjectenergy-saving
dc.subjectenvironmental analysis
dc.subjectInsulation
dc.subjectpayback period
dc.subject.classificationEnergy & Fuels
dc.subject.classificationEngineering, Chemical
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Sciences
dc.subject.classificationEngineering
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.subject.otherElectric insulation
dc.subject.otherEnergy conservation
dc.subject.otherFuels
dc.subject.otherInsulation
dc.subject.otherInvestments
dc.subject.otherX ray photoelectron spectroscopy
dc.subject.otherDetermination coefficients
dc.subject.otherDifferent climatic zones
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental analysis
dc.subject.otherIndustrial users
dc.subject.otherInsulation thickness
dc.subject.otherMathematical correlation
dc.subject.otherOptimum insulation thickness
dc.subject.otherPayback periods
dc.subject.otherGas fuel analysis
dc.titleEmpirical modeling between degree days and optimum insulation thickness for external wall
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex22
rdl.citation.scopus21
rdl.citation.wos24
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.scopus.quartileQ2
rdl.sdgSDG13
rdl.sdgSDG07
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)