A comparative analysis of pictogram use in mobile weather applications: The cases of MGM, AccuWeather, and Apple Weather

MakaleAçık Erişim

Özet

This study examines pictogram use in the interface designs of three mobile weather applications — MGM, AccuWeather, and Apple Weather — through a qualitative comparative case study approach. Focusing on user perception speed and information transfer efficiency rather than aesthetic value, the analysis evaluated each application across four criteria: pictogram compliance, visual complexity level, cognitive load, and icon-typography balance. Findings were theoretically grounded in usability heuristics. Expert review analysis revealed that Apple Weather achieves the lowest cognitive load through its integrated typographic system and standardized pictogram library. AccuWeather presents a moderate cognitive load through its standardized proprietary icon set, while MGM produced the highest cognitive load due to inconsistent icon styles, weak visual hierarchy, and touch target dimensions falling below international accessibility standards. The findings demonstrate that standardized and simplified pictogram systems reduce cognitive load and improve user experience, and underscore the need for systematic usability evaluation of institutionally developed mobile applications against international standards.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/5927Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1899375Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
OpenAlex
0
TR Dizin
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorUsta, Mesut
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T15:11:06.446009618Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T15:11:06.446009618Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis study examines pictogram use in the interface designs of three mobile weather applications — MGM, AccuWeather, and Apple Weather — through a qualitative comparative case study approach. Focusing on user perception speed and information transfer efficiency rather than aesthetic value, the analysis evaluated each application across four criteria: pictogram compliance, visual complexity level, cognitive load, and icon-typography balance. Findings were theoretically grounded in usability heuristics. Expert review analysis revealed that Apple Weather achieves the lowest cognitive load through its integrated typographic system and standardized pictogram library. AccuWeather presents a moderate cognitive load through its standardized proprietary icon set, while MGM produced the highest cognitive load due to inconsistent icon styles, weak visual hierarchy, and touch target dimensions falling below international accessibility standards. The findings demonstrate that standardized and simplified pictogram systems reduce cognitive load and improve user experience, and underscore the need for systematic usability evaluation of institutionally developed mobile applications against international standards.
dc.identifier.doi10.26466/opusjsr.1899375
dc.identifier.eissn2791-9862
dc.identifier.endpage13
dc.identifier.issn2791-9781
dc.identifier.issue2026
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/5927
dc.identifier.volume23
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofOPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectİletişim
dc.subjectBilgisayar Bilimleri, Bilgi Sistemleri
dc.titleA comparative analysis of pictogram use in mobile weather applications: The cases of MGM, AccuWeather, and Apple Weather
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/5765949
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN