RGO-CBPAC versus CBPAC for diluted leachate treatment: adsorption isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 6 · Temiz Su ve Sanitasyon
  • SDG 12 · Sorumlu Üretim ve Tüketim

Özet

This study compares carbon-based activated carbon (CBPAC) and reduced graphene oxide-modified CBPAC (RGO-CBPAC) for removing COD, NH3–N, and turbidity from 1:4 diluted leachate from the Bingöl landfill site. Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) analysis indicated severe micropore blockage in CBPAC after adsorption (887 → 0.76 m2/g), whereas RGO-CBPAC retained a higher surface area (908 → 23 m2/g) and mesoporous structure, demonstrating enhanced structural stability due to graphene incorporation. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDX) confirmed the presence of surface functional groups and effective pollutant uptake, with RGO-CBPAC showing stronger surface–pollutant interactions. Zeta potential analysis showed pH-dependent surface charge behaviour, with CBPAC exhibiting amphoteric characteristics and RGO-CBPAC maintaining a more negative surface. After adsorption, both became more negatively charged, indicating the accumulation of negatively charged species. Kinetic analysis showed that COD adsorption on CBPAC followed pseudo-first-order and intraparticle diffusion models, whereas NH3–N and turbidity followed pseudo-second-order kinetics. In contrast, RGO-CBPAC exhibited pseudo-second-order and intraparticle diffusion behaviour for all pollutants, suggesting chemisorption with diffusion-controlled contributions. Adsorption equilibrium was best described by the Langmuir isotherm, yielding maximum capacities of 500 and 588 mg O2/g for COD, 17.5 and 36.5 mg/g for NH3–N, and 18.1 and 58.5 mg/g ((NH2)2H2SO4)/g for turbidity on CBPAC and RGO-CBPAC, respectively. Thermodynamic analysis demonstrated that COD and turbidity removal using RGO-CBPAC were spontaneous (∆G° < 0) and endothermic (∆H° > 0), whereas NH3–N removal remained non-spontaneous for both adsorbents. RGO incorporation significantly enhanced adsorption performance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/825Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-026-07303-0Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
1
WoS
1
OpenAlex
1
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorOgedey, A.
dc.contributor.authorOguz, E.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:53:40.364826093Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:53:40.364826093Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis study compares carbon-based activated carbon (CBPAC) and reduced graphene oxide-modified CBPAC (RGO-CBPAC) for removing COD, NH3–N, and turbidity from 1:4 diluted leachate from the Bingöl landfill site. Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) analysis indicated severe micropore blockage in CBPAC after adsorption (887 → 0.76 m2/g), whereas RGO-CBPAC retained a higher surface area (908 → 23 m2/g) and mesoporous structure, demonstrating enhanced structural stability due to graphene incorporation. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDX) confirmed the presence of surface functional groups and effective pollutant uptake, with RGO-CBPAC showing stronger surface–pollutant interactions. Zeta potential analysis showed pH-dependent surface charge behaviour, with CBPAC exhibiting amphoteric characteristics and RGO-CBPAC maintaining a more negative surface. After adsorption, both became more negatively charged, indicating the accumulation of negatively charged species. Kinetic analysis showed that COD adsorption on CBPAC followed pseudo-first-order and intraparticle diffusion models, whereas NH3–N and turbidity followed pseudo-second-order kinetics. In contrast, RGO-CBPAC exhibited pseudo-second-order and intraparticle diffusion behaviour for all pollutants, suggesting chemisorption with diffusion-controlled contributions. Adsorption equilibrium was best described by the Langmuir isotherm, yielding maximum capacities of 500 and 588 mg O2/g for COD, 17.5 and 36.5 mg/g for NH3–N, and 18.1 and 58.5 mg/g ((NH2)2H2SO4)/g for turbidity on CBPAC and RGO-CBPAC, respectively. Thermodynamic analysis demonstrated that COD and turbidity removal using RGO-CBPAC were spontaneous (∆G° < 0) and endothermic (∆H° > 0), whereas NH3–N removal remained non-spontaneous for both adsorbents. RGO incorporation significantly enhanced adsorption performance.
dc.description.sponsorshipTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, TUBITAK
dc.identifier.articlenumber491
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13762-026-07303-0
dc.identifier.eissn1735-2630
dc.identifier.issn1735-1472
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105040814054
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/825
dc.identifier.volume23
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001784000100001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCBPAC
dc.subjectCOD
dc.subjectLeachate
dc.subjectNH<sub>3</sub>–N
dc.subjectRGO-CBPAC
dc.subjectTurbidity
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Sciences
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.subject.otherActivated carbon
dc.subject.otherAdsorption
dc.subject.otherAdsorption isotherms
dc.subject.otherDiffusion
dc.subject.otherGraphene
dc.subject.otherLeachate treatment
dc.subject.otherMesoporous materials
dc.subject.otherScanning electron microscopy
dc.subject.otherSpectrum analysis
dc.subject.otherStability
dc.subject.otherThermoanalysis
dc.subject.otherCBPAC
dc.subject.otherCOD
dc.subject.otherLeachates
dc.subject.otherNegatively charged
dc.subject.otherNH 3
dc.subject.otherNH3–N
dc.subject.otherOrdering diffusion
dc.subject.otherReduced graphene oxide-modified CBPAC
dc.subject.otherReduced graphene oxides
dc.subject.otherammonium compound
dc.subject.otherchemical oxygen demand
dc.subject.otherisotherm
dc.subject.otherlandfill
dc.subject.otherleachate
dc.subject.otherpollutant removal
dc.subject.otherreaction kinetics
dc.subject.otherthermodynamics
dc.subject.otherturbidity
dc.subject.otherEnergy dispersive spectroscopy
dc.subject.otherFourier transform infrared spectroscopy
dc.titleRGO-CBPAC versus CBPAC for diluted leachate treatment: adsorption isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex1
rdl.citation.scopus1
rdl.citation.wos1
rdl.oa.statushybrid
rdl.oa.urlhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13762-026-07303-0.pdf
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG06
rdl.sdgSDG12
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)