Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları

Bu dergideki yayınlar

3 →
  • MakaleAçık Erişim2025Scopus SJRQ1
    Evaluation of Green Deal compliance performance with a hybrid comparative multi-attribute decision model

    Karadag, Mehmet; Gul, Muhammet; Yucesan, Melih; Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel; Ishizaka, Alessio; Khan, Jehangir

    The environmental and economic transformation initiated by the European Green Deal is influencing not only EU member states, but also other countries engaged in trade with the EU. This transformation mandates a shift towards sustainable practices in sectors such as agriculture, industry, transportation, energy, and finance. Compliance with the Green Deal is increasingly crucial for countries, particularly those with significant commercial ties to the EU. However, differing levels of development lead to varying degrees of implementation. While studies on the Green Deal compliance of EU member states exist, an evaluation of Türkiye—a candidate EU member with substantial trade relations—would address a significant gap in the literature. This study introduces a novel hybrid comparative multi-attribute decision model that combines subjective (Best Worst Method and its derivatives) and objective (Entropy) weighting to determine the relative importance of 14 sub-criteria under three main criteria: “Reducing” the impacts of climate change, “Protecting” the planet and health, and “Enabling” a green and just transition. Using the Ratio Product Model (RPM), Türkiye's Green Deal compliance from 2017 to 2021 was evaluated. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to validate the robustness of the findings, and comparisons were made using various multi-attribute decision models, including SAW, TOPSIS, and VIKOR, as well as benchmarking against EU countries. The criteria weights, derived from a combination of subjective and objective methods, highlighted the dominant importance of the “Reducing” criterion across all methods. The “Enabling” and “Protecting” criteria showed slight variations in importance depending on the method. The RPM results indicated that 2021 was Türkiye's best-performing year in terms of Green Deal compliance, while 2017 showed the weakest performance. Despite some fluctuations between 2018 and 2019, Türkiye demonstrated significant progress overall. The study not only advances the methodology for evaluating Green Deal compliance but also provides actionable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders, enabling more informed decision-making. By highlighting Türkiye's trajectory, the findings offer strategic guidance for non-EU countries aiming to align with Green Deal objectives, fostering sustainable development and strengthening economic ties with the EU.

    • SDG 13 · İklim Eylemi
    AtıfScopus11OpenAlex11
    ScopusWeb of Scienceİncele
  • MakaleYalnız künye2023Scopus SJRQ1
    An integrated hybrid MCDM approach to evaluate countries’ COVID-19 risks

    Mete, Suleyman; Yucesan, Melih; Gul, Muhammet; Ozceylan, Eren

    To enable planning and early reaction efforts, it is important to identify the nations most at risk from COVID-19's health and humanitarian effects, which could exceed present national response capabilities. INFORM COVID-19 Risk Index developed by European Commission is one of the initiatives to meet the aforementioned need. However, the Index has 40 conflicting and comprehensive indicators (e.g., health system capacity, hygiene, vulnerability) and different countries that lead to a need for multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches. This paper offers an integrated MCDM approach with two phases to re-assess the countries' COVID-19 risks based on INFORM COVID-19 Risk Index. In the first phase, the 40 indicators are prioritized using the Entropy-based multi-choice best-worst method (MC-BWM) to provide multiple viewpoints for the preferences values. In the second phase, 29 countries from different geographical regions are ranked using the COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) method. Applying these three methods together on the COVID-19 risk assessment of countries is the most significant novelty for the relevant literature. The proposed approach has undergone a thorough comparative evaluation with the released INFORM COVID-19 Risk Index, and recommendations are provided based on different scenario analyses.

    • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam
    AtıfScopus21WoS16OpenAlex18
    ScopusWeb of Scienceİncele
  • MakaleYalnız künye2022Scopus SJRQ1
    Performance evaluation of Turkish Universities by an integrated Bayesian BWM-TOPSIS model

    Gul, Muhammet; Yucesan, Melih

    This study aims to develop a university ranking model with the aid of performance measures in the “University monitoring and evaluation reports-2019” published by the Council of Higher Education Institution in Turkey. In this context, some of the performance criteria stated in these reports are filtered and 34 sub-criteria under five main criteria are weighted using the Bayesian Best-Worst Method (BBWM). Then, 189 listed public and private universities are ranked using the TOPSIS multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) method. We have adopted the MCDM concept because many evaluation criteria/sub-criteria and alternative universities are taken into account. For this study, we apply an integrated MCDM model. First, we use BBWM to accomplish the first goal and adopt the TOPSIS method for the second purpose, using the BBWM results. Our purpose in using BBWM is due to its probabilistic structure that reduces the loss of information when handling group decisions. In this context, the evaluations of 11 academic experts are combined and a solid weighting is made by obtaining the credal rankings of performance criteria. Using TOPSIS is its logic of proximity to ideal and the ability to evaluate many alternatives. In the context of the study, state-private university-based, nomenclature of territorial units for statistics-2 (NUTS-2)-based and classical geographical regions-based rankings are also discussed. The study seeks to help universities optimize their performance efficiently. The results of the study can be adapted as a reference for other educational institutions and public institutions in their efforts to evaluate, improve their performance and form various policies.

    AtıfScopus79WoS61OpenAlex79
    ScopusWeb of Scienceİncele
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
creativeworkseries.issn0038-0121
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:53:46.581228923Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:53:46.581228923Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/951
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleSocio-Economic Planning Sciences