The Turkish Version of the Self Evaluation of Breathing Questionnaire: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Validity and Reliability

MakaleYalnız künyeScopus SJRQ2
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

Investigating the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Breathing Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SEBQ), a tool for measuring dysfunctional breathing. Ninety-two healthy adults (mean (range) age 29.4 (19–56) years; 39 males) were analysed. The SEBQ was translated and adapted into Turkish. At baseline, data were collected using the SEBQ, Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ), breath-holding time, and Short Form 36 (SF-36). The SEBQ was repeated within 7–14 days. SEBQ validity was assessed through content, structural, and convergent/divergent validity analyses, while reliability was evaluated for internal consistency, stability, and reproducibility. One item was removed based on exploratory factor analysis. The SEBQ has a two-factor structure and explains 50.1% of total variance, confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. It has a positive correlation with the NQ and a negative correlation with SF-36 subscales, but not with breath-holding time and general health. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.931, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.814. The Standard Error of Measurement and Smallest Real Difference were 5.06 and 15.03, respectively. The SEBQ is well-structured, valid, internally consistent, stable, and reproducible for assessing subjective unexplained respiratory symptoms in the Turkish population.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/1058Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09726-wYayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
1
WoS
1
OpenAlex
3
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorAtaş, Kübra
dc.contributor.authorKızmaz, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Ebru Kaya
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:53:51.951406286Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:53:51.951406286Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractInvestigating the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Breathing Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SEBQ), a tool for measuring dysfunctional breathing. Ninety-two healthy adults (mean (range) age 29.4 (19–56) years; 39 males) were analysed. The SEBQ was translated and adapted into Turkish. At baseline, data were collected using the SEBQ, Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ), breath-holding time, and Short Form 36 (SF-36). The SEBQ was repeated within 7–14 days. SEBQ validity was assessed through content, structural, and convergent/divergent validity analyses, while reliability was evaluated for internal consistency, stability, and reproducibility. One item was removed based on exploratory factor analysis. The SEBQ has a two-factor structure and explains 50.1% of total variance, confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. It has a positive correlation with the NQ and a negative correlation with SF-36 subscales, but not with breath-holding time and general health. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.931, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.814. The Standard Error of Measurement and Smallest Real Difference were 5.06 and 15.03, respectively. The SEBQ is well-structured, valid, internally consistent, stable, and reproducible for assessing subjective unexplained respiratory symptoms in the Turkish population.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10484-025-09726-w
dc.identifier.eissn1573-3270
dc.identifier.endpage199
dc.identifier.issn1090-0586
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid40624301
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105009910916
dc.identifier.startpage189
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/1058
dc.identifier.volume51
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001523864900001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Psychophysiology Biofeedback
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectCross-cultural adaptation
dc.subjectDysfunctional breathing
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectSelf evaluation of breathing questionnaire
dc.subjectValidity
dc.subject.classificationPsychology, Clinical
dc.subject.classificationPsychology
dc.subject.otherAdult
dc.subject.otherCross-Cultural Comparison
dc.subject.otherDiagnostic Self Evaluation
dc.subject.otherFemale
dc.subject.otherHumans
dc.subject.otherMale
dc.subject.otherMiddle Aged
dc.subject.otherPsychometrics
dc.subject.otherReproducibility of Results
dc.subject.otherRespiration
dc.subject.otherRespiration Disorders
dc.subject.otherSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject.otherTurkey
dc.subject.otherYoung Adult
dc.subject.otherbreathing
dc.subject.otherbreathing disorder
dc.subject.othercultural factor
dc.subject.otherdiagnosis
dc.subject.otherhuman
dc.subject.otherpsychometry
dc.subject.otherquestionnaire
dc.subject.otherreproducibility
dc.subject.otherself evaluation
dc.subject.otherturkey (bird)
dc.subject.othervalidation study
dc.titleThe Turkish Version of the Self Evaluation of Breathing Questionnaire: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Validity and Reliability
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex3
rdl.citation.scopus1
rdl.citation.wos1
rdl.departmentDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Munzur University, Tunceli, Türkiye
rdl.departmentDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University, Balikesir, Türkiye
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.scopus.quartileQ2
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)