Comparison of the Performance of Machine Learning Methods with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Making for Effective Fake News Detection

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ4

Özet

In this paper, the success of machine learning models applied to two datasets consisting of fake news was examined. The performance of these methods was measured using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-Score. Evaluation metrics for all models were calculated using TF-IDF and N-gram TF-IDF for Dataset 1 and Dataset 2, respectively. In continuation of the study, a decision-making mechanism was created to measure the success of machine learning methods. The success of these models was compared by creating a decision-making mechanism using intuitionistic fuzzy sets. The PROMETHEE method was used here. In the first stage of the study, the dataset samples evaluated were expressed using classical sets, while in the second stage, the success of the models according to the metrics was expressed using intuitionistic fuzzy values. This was to minimize the uncertainty in the model success results. The results obtained in the first stage of the study were evaluated in the second stage using a decision-making mechanism. In this mechanism, machine learning models represent the alternatives, while classification metrics represent the criteria. When evaluating machine learning models, experts provide subjective opinions based on each classification metric to determine the successful model.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/1248Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.1830741Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorTuğrul, Feride
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:54:01.644653092Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:54:01.644653092Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, the success of machine learning models applied to two datasets consisting of fake news was examined. The performance of these methods was measured using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-Score. Evaluation metrics for all models were calculated using TF-IDF and N-gram TF-IDF for Dataset 1 and Dataset 2, respectively. In continuation of the study, a decision-making mechanism was created to measure the success of machine learning methods. The success of these models was compared by creating a decision-making mechanism using intuitionistic fuzzy sets. The PROMETHEE method was used here. In the first stage of the study, the dataset samples evaluated were expressed using classical sets, while in the second stage, the success of the models according to the metrics was expressed using intuitionistic fuzzy values. This was to minimize the uncertainty in the model success results. The results obtained in the first stage of the study were evaluated in the second stage using a decision-making mechanism. In this mechanism, machine learning models represent the alternatives, while classification metrics represent the criteria. When evaluating machine learning models, experts provide subjective opinions based on each classification metric to determine the successful model.
dc.identifier.doi10.31202/ecjse.1830741
dc.identifier.endpage304
dc.identifier.issn2148-3736
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105037836161
dc.identifier.startpage290
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/1248
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTUBITAK
dc.relation.ispartofEl-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectDecision making
dc.subjectfake news detection
dc.subjectintuitionistic fuzzy set
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.titleComparison of the Performance of Machine Learning Methods with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Making for Effective Fake News Detection
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.1830741
rdl.scopus.quartileQ4
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS