Comparison of the Catching Efficiency of Monofilament Gillnets with Different Mesh Size

MakaleYalnız künyeScopus SJRQ3

Özet

This study was conducted in Keban dam lake Cemisgezek region during 2000-2001 fishing season. In the study, the effect of mesh size on catching efficiency was analyzed. For this reason, a total length of 800 m gillnet was used, particularly two monofilament gillnets with 50, 60, 70 and 90 mm mesh size, each being 100 m long. During the research, Cyprinus carpio and Squalius cephalus was indicated with own species names, which are caught on 22 hunting attempts. Barbus esocinus, Barbus capito pectoralis and Barbus mystaceus species regarded as Barbus sp., Capoeta trutta and Capoeta umbla species regarded as Capoeta sp. The most frequently caught species in the research were Capoeta sp. on 50 and 70 mm mesh sizes, Barbus sp. on 60 mm mesh size and Cyprinus carpi on 90 mm mesh size. The species that is least frequently fished on all gillnets was Squalius cephalus. When the catch per unit effort was analyzed taking into account all species, it was observed that with 83.1 g m(-1) catch per unit effort, 60 mm gillnet was more efficient than all other gillnets. This gillnet was followed by 79.9, 41.0 and 31.8 g m(-1) catch per unit efforts for 50, 70 and 90 mm mesh sizes, respectively. In conclusion, it has been found out that in the study region, gillnets with 50 and 60 mm mesh sizes are more effective than gillnets with 70 and 90 mm mesh sizes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/4288Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
WoS
1
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorPala, Murat
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Fahrettin
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:59:08.323968999Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:59:08.323968999Z
dc.date.issued2010-06
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted in Keban dam lake Cemisgezek region during 2000-2001 fishing season. In the study, the effect of mesh size on catching efficiency was analyzed. For this reason, a total length of 800 m gillnet was used, particularly two monofilament gillnets with 50, 60, 70 and 90 mm mesh size, each being 100 m long. During the research, Cyprinus carpio and Squalius cephalus was indicated with own species names, which are caught on 22 hunting attempts. Barbus esocinus, Barbus capito pectoralis and Barbus mystaceus species regarded as Barbus sp., Capoeta trutta and Capoeta umbla species regarded as Capoeta sp. The most frequently caught species in the research were Capoeta sp. on 50 and 70 mm mesh sizes, Barbus sp. on 60 mm mesh size and Cyprinus carpi on 90 mm mesh size. The species that is least frequently fished on all gillnets was Squalius cephalus. When the catch per unit effort was analyzed taking into account all species, it was observed that with 83.1 g m(-1) catch per unit effort, 60 mm gillnet was more efficient than all other gillnets. This gillnet was followed by 79.9, 41.0 and 31.8 g m(-1) catch per unit efforts for 50, 70 and 90 mm mesh sizes, respectively. In conclusion, it has been found out that in the study region, gillnets with 50 and 60 mm mesh sizes are more effective than gillnets with 70 and 90 mm mesh sizes.
dc.identifier.eissn1993-601X
dc.identifier.endpage1149
dc.identifier.issn1680-5593
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.startpage1146
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/4288
dc.identifier.volume9
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000277120800011
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMEDWELL ONLINE
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectKeban Dam Lake
dc.subjectgillnet
dc.subjectcatching efficiency
dc.subjectCPUE
dc.subjectfisheries
dc.subjectmesh size
dc.subject.classificationVeterinary Sciences
dc.titleComparison of the Catching Efficiency of Monofilament Gillnets with Different Mesh Size
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.wos1
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.scopus.quartileQ3
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)