Failure of a Code-Compliant Reinforced Concrete Building: Damage Patterns and Nonlinear Seismic Response

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 11 · Sürdürülebilir Şehirler ve Topluluklar

Özet

This study investigates the seismic performance limitations of a newly constructed reinforced concrete building that collapsed during the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş–Elbistan earthquake despite formal compliance with current seismic design requirements. Beyond the specific earthquake event, the study addresses a broader scientific problem: the limited understanding of the relationship between observed damage mechanisms and nonlinear dynamic response in mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings. The first part classifies recurring structural and non-structural damage patterns identified in newly constructed RC residences. The second part presents a nonlinear fiber-based static and dynamic analysis of a collapsed mid-rise building. Nonlinear dynamic analyses were conducted using ground motion records scaled to match the site-specific elastic design spectrum defined by TBDY 2018, corresponding to predefined seismic performance levels rather than an incremental dynamic analysis framework. The results indicate that an extremely low shear wall–to–floor area ratio (0.0357%) combined with asymmetric vertical element distribution significantly amplified torsional response and local shear demands. Nonlinear dynamic analyses showed that critical shear walls exceeded Collapse Prevention limits under DD2-level excitation, while system-level shear contribution limits remained within code-defined thresholds. Dynamic base shear demand corresponded to approximately 30% of the maximum nonlinear capacity obtained from pushover analysis, indicating that localized member failure rather than global strength deficiency governed the collapse mechanism. The analytically identified critical members were consistent with the observed collapse configuration, particularly at the soft ground story. The findings demonstrate that prescriptive code compliance alone may not ensure satisfactory seismic performance when structural irregularities, torsional amplification, and detailing deficiencies coexist. The results are consistent with damage patterns reported in other recent destructive earthquakes and contribute to improving the understanding of collapse mechanisms in code-compliant RC buildings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/1119Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16051012Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
4
OpenAlex
7
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorOnat, Onur
dc.contributor.authorKaraşin, İbrahim Baran
dc.contributor.authorYön, Burak
dc.contributor.authorVarolgüneş, Sadık
dc.contributor.authorÖncü, Mehmet Emin
dc.contributor.authorUslu, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:53:55.060222224Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:53:55.060222224Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the seismic performance limitations of a newly constructed reinforced concrete building that collapsed during the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş–Elbistan earthquake despite formal compliance with current seismic design requirements. Beyond the specific earthquake event, the study addresses a broader scientific problem: the limited understanding of the relationship between observed damage mechanisms and nonlinear dynamic response in mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings. The first part classifies recurring structural and non-structural damage patterns identified in newly constructed RC residences. The second part presents a nonlinear fiber-based static and dynamic analysis of a collapsed mid-rise building. Nonlinear dynamic analyses were conducted using ground motion records scaled to match the site-specific elastic design spectrum defined by TBDY 2018, corresponding to predefined seismic performance levels rather than an incremental dynamic analysis framework. The results indicate that an extremely low shear wall–to–floor area ratio (0.0357%) combined with asymmetric vertical element distribution significantly amplified torsional response and local shear demands. Nonlinear dynamic analyses showed that critical shear walls exceeded Collapse Prevention limits under DD2-level excitation, while system-level shear contribution limits remained within code-defined thresholds. Dynamic base shear demand corresponded to approximately 30% of the maximum nonlinear capacity obtained from pushover analysis, indicating that localized member failure rather than global strength deficiency governed the collapse mechanism. The analytically identified critical members were consistent with the observed collapse configuration, particularly at the soft ground story. The findings demonstrate that prescriptive code compliance alone may not ensure satisfactory seismic performance when structural irregularities, torsional amplification, and detailing deficiencies coexist. The results are consistent with damage patterns reported in other recent destructive earthquakes and contribute to improving the understanding of collapse mechanisms in code-compliant RC buildings.
dc.identifier.articlenumber1012
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings16051012
dc.identifier.eissn2075-5309
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105032739528
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/1119
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001713724500001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofBuildings
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectcode-compliant design
dc.subjectcollapse analysis
dc.subjectdamage classification
dc.subjectKahramanmaraş earthquakes
dc.subjectnonlinear dynamic analysis
dc.subjectreinforced concrete
dc.subjectseismic performance
dc.subjectshear wall ratio
dc.subjecttorsional irregularity
dc.subject.otherCodes (symbols)
dc.subject.otherCompliant mechanisms
dc.subject.otherConcrete buildings
dc.subject.otherConcrete construction
dc.subject.otherDamage detection
dc.subject.otherDynamic analysis
dc.subject.otherDynamic response
dc.subject.otherDynamics
dc.subject.otherEarthquake effects
dc.subject.otherFailure (mechanical)
dc.subject.otherNonlinear analysis
dc.subject.otherSafety engineering
dc.subject.otherSeismic design
dc.subject.otherSeismic response
dc.subject.otherSeismic waves
dc.subject.otherShear flow
dc.subject.otherShear walls
dc.subject.otherStructural dynamics
dc.subject.otherCode-compliant design
dc.subject.otherCollapse analysis
dc.subject.otherCollapse mechanism
dc.subject.otherDamage classification
dc.subject.otherKahramanmaraş earthquake
dc.subject.otherNon-linear dynamic analysis
dc.subject.otherReinforced concrete buildings
dc.subject.otherSeismic Performance
dc.subject.otherShear wall ratio
dc.subject.otherTorsional irregularity
dc.subject.otherReinforced concrete
dc.titleFailure of a Code-Compliant Reinforced Concrete Building: Damage Patterns and Nonlinear Seismic Response
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex7
rdl.citation.scopus4
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16051012
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG11
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS