A risk assessment model with dependent failure modes for the manufacturing and design processes of medical equipment

MakaleYalnız künyeScopus SJRQ2
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

The reliability of medical equipment is paramount for surgical success. Manufacturers are continuously exploring risk assessment and improvement strategies to prevent equipment malfunctions during surgery. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) can primarily be divided into two types: DFMEA (Design FMEA) and PFMEA (Process FMEA). Traditional FMEA serves as a practical tool for identifying and prioritizing key failure modes (FMs). However, past FMEA research has overlooked the interdependencies among FMs, treating them as independent entities, which does not align with real-world operations. This paper introduces a groundbreaking risk dependency assessment model aimed at addressing the influential relationships among FMs. The modified technique for defining the influential relationship of failure modes (modified TEDIR-FMs) is developed to compute the relative risk scores of different FMs accurately. At its core, this paper integrates concepts from multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques into FMEA, with a particular focus on the interdependencies of failure modes in the manufacturing and design manufacturing processes of medical equipment. The model’s application is demonstrated through a case study on a medical device for hernia surgery. The introduction of modified TEDIR-FMs not only enhances the accuracy of risk assessments but also offers a fresh perspective on risk management within the design and manufacturing processes. The research results indicate that the three failure modes with the highest risk are “adhesive does not deploy or only partially deploys from the dispenser,” “the mesh does not adhere to the adhesive,” and “the adhesive drips from the tip.” In the manufacturing and design processes of this device, greater attention should be given to improving the adhesive components.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/2118Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-024-01919-7Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
5
WoS
4
OpenAlex
2
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorLo, Huai-Wei
dc.contributor.authorGul, Muhammet
dc.contributor.authorYucesan, Melih
dc.contributor.authorLiaw, Ching-Fang
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:54:57.578944593Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:54:57.578944593Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThe reliability of medical equipment is paramount for surgical success. Manufacturers are continuously exploring risk assessment and improvement strategies to prevent equipment malfunctions during surgery. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) can primarily be divided into two types: DFMEA (Design FMEA) and PFMEA (Process FMEA). Traditional FMEA serves as a practical tool for identifying and prioritizing key failure modes (FMs). However, past FMEA research has overlooked the interdependencies among FMs, treating them as independent entities, which does not align with real-world operations. This paper introduces a groundbreaking risk dependency assessment model aimed at addressing the influential relationships among FMs. The modified technique for defining the influential relationship of failure modes (modified TEDIR-FMs) is developed to compute the relative risk scores of different FMs accurately. At its core, this paper integrates concepts from multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques into FMEA, with a particular focus on the interdependencies of failure modes in the manufacturing and design manufacturing processes of medical equipment. The model’s application is demonstrated through a case study on a medical device for hernia surgery. The introduction of modified TEDIR-FMs not only enhances the accuracy of risk assessments but also offers a fresh perspective on risk management within the design and manufacturing processes. The research results indicate that the three failure modes with the highest risk are “adhesive does not deploy or only partially deploys from the dispenser,” “the mesh does not adhere to the adhesive,” and “the adhesive drips from the tip.” In the manufacturing and design processes of this device, greater attention should be given to improving the adhesive components.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12008-024-01919-7
dc.identifier.eissn1955-2505
dc.identifier.endpage4074
dc.identifier.issn1955-2513
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85195206570
dc.identifier.startpage4059
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/2118
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001237772000001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectFMEA
dc.subjectManufacturing and design processes
dc.subjectMCDM
dc.subjectMedical equipment
dc.subjectRisk assessment
dc.subject.classificationEngineering, Manufacturing
dc.subject.classificationEngineering
dc.subject.otherAdhesives
dc.subject.otherDecision making
dc.subject.otherDesign
dc.subject.otherFailure modes
dc.subject.otherRisk management
dc.subject.otherSurgery
dc.subject.otherAssessment and improvement
dc.subject.otherAssessment strategies
dc.subject.otherDependent failure
dc.subject.otherDesign-process
dc.subject.otherFailure mode and effects analysis
dc.subject.otherManufacturing process
dc.subject.otherMultiple criteria decision making
dc.subject.otherRisk assessment - modelling
dc.subject.otherRisk improvement
dc.subject.otherRisks assessments
dc.subject.otherRisk assessment
dc.titleA risk assessment model with dependent failure modes for the manufacturing and design processes of medical equipment
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex2
rdl.citation.scopus5
rdl.citation.wos4
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.scopus.quartileQ2
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)