Assessment of hydraulic properties of technosols using Beerkan and multiple tension disc infiltration methods

MakaleYalnız künyeScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 6 · Temiz Su ve Sanitasyon
  • SDG 11 · Sürdürülebilir Şehirler ve Topluluklar
  • SDG 12 · Sorumlu Üretim ve Tüketim
  • SDG 15 · Karasal Yaşam

Özet

The increasing global urban sprawl requires large amounts of materials, putting huge pressure on numerous natural resources. In particular, vast quantities of soils are used to create infrastructures or green spaces associated with new developments. Alternative solutions aimed at alleviating soil consumption are thus being encouraged. Creating urban soils by recycling waste from industrial and construction activities is feasible, but apart from their support function the resulting technosols should also be able to provide some ecosystem services such as the capacity to infiltrate water and filter contaminants. Various methods are routinely used for in situ characterization of the hydraulic behaviour of natural soils, but their ability to assess the hydraulic properties of technosols remains unclear. Indeed, technosols formed from recycled waste differ markedly from natural soil because they often contain a considerable proportion of coarse artefacts that affect their structure. In this study, results obtained by two distinct methods (ponding and tension infiltrometry), associated with two data processing methods (Beerkan estimation soil transfer (BEST) and numerical inversion), on a set of infiltration data measured on experimental plots made of technosols have been compared with each other. Both methods provided similar results and thus proved to be reliable when applied to technosols. Highlights: Reuse of by-products from anthropogenic activities is crucial to alleviate the consumption of natural soil. Hydraulic properties of technosols must be monitored to assess some of the ecosystem services they can provide. BEST and numerical inversion of multiple tension disc infiltration data gave consistent results. Reliability of the hydraulic characterization methods used for technosols deserves further inquiry.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/3659Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12791Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
10
WoS
10
OpenAlex
12
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorBouarafa, Sofia
dc.contributor.authorPeyneau, Pierre-Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorAngulo-Jaramillo, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorLassabatere, Laurent
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:56:55.528842899Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:56:55.528842899Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThe increasing global urban sprawl requires large amounts of materials, putting huge pressure on numerous natural resources. In particular, vast quantities of soils are used to create infrastructures or green spaces associated with new developments. Alternative solutions aimed at alleviating soil consumption are thus being encouraged. Creating urban soils by recycling waste from industrial and construction activities is feasible, but apart from their support function the resulting technosols should also be able to provide some ecosystem services such as the capacity to infiltrate water and filter contaminants. Various methods are routinely used for in situ characterization of the hydraulic behaviour of natural soils, but their ability to assess the hydraulic properties of technosols remains unclear. Indeed, technosols formed from recycled waste differ markedly from natural soil because they often contain a considerable proportion of coarse artefacts that affect their structure. In this study, results obtained by two distinct methods (ponding and tension infiltrometry), associated with two data processing methods (Beerkan estimation soil transfer (BEST) and numerical inversion), on a set of infiltration data measured on experimental plots made of technosols have been compared with each other. Both methods provided similar results and thus proved to be reliable when applied to technosols. Highlights: Reuse of by-products from anthropogenic activities is crucial to alleviate the consumption of natural soil. Hydraulic properties of technosols must be monitored to assess some of the ecosystem services they can provide. BEST and numerical inversion of multiple tension disc infiltration data gave consistent results. Reliability of the hydraulic characterization methods used for technosols deserves further inquiry.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ejss.12791
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2389
dc.identifier.endpage1062
dc.identifier.issn1351-0754
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85064036367
dc.identifier.startpage1049
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/3659
dc.identifier.volume70
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000483693100010
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Soil Science
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectexperimental urban soils
dc.subjectinfiltrometry method comparison
dc.subjecttechnogenic materials
dc.subject.classificationSoil Science
dc.subject.classificationAgriculture
dc.subject.otherassessment method
dc.subject.othercomparative study
dc.subject.otherdata processing
dc.subject.otherecosystem service
dc.subject.otherexperimental study
dc.subject.otherhuman activity
dc.subject.otherhydraulic property
dc.subject.otherinfiltration
dc.subject.otherinfiltrometer
dc.subject.otherinfrastructure
dc.subject.othermethodology
dc.subject.othernatural resource
dc.subject.otherreliability analysis
dc.subject.othersoil type
dc.subject.otherurban sprawl
dc.titleAssessment of hydraulic properties of technosols using Beerkan and multiple tension disc infiltration methods
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex12
rdl.citation.scopus10
rdl.citation.wos10
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG06
rdl.sdgSDG12
rdl.sdgSDG11
rdl.sdgSDG15
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)