The Historical-PoliticalJourney of Nominalism from William of Ockham to Foucault

MakaleYalnız künye

Özet

Nominalism is one of the fundamental ontological-epistemological trajectories that crystallized within Medieval philosophy and played a decisive role in the constitution of modern thought. Rooted in the Ancient Greek debate on universals, this concept attained a systematic structure during the Middle Ages, becoming a horizon that defines the boundaries of modern philosophical practices. Various philosophical and political traditions have problematized established philosophical orthodoxy through the conceptual possibilities offered by nominalism. This study examines the reception of nominalism by different thinkers within the framework of critical theories, specifically focusing on Michel Foucault's historical nominalism. Furthermore, the article analyzes how nominalism, as one of the most potent theoretical foundations of anti-essentialist thought, nourishes the ontological ground of contemporary social movements and how the legacy of William of Ockham is reproduced within an oppositional habitus.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/4627Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.90421Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
WoS
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorPalanci, Cihan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T15:03:33.103545512Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T15:03:33.103545512Z
dc.date.issued2026-06
dc.description.abstractNominalism is one of the fundamental ontological-epistemological trajectories that crystallized within Medieval philosophy and played a decisive role in the constitution of modern thought. Rooted in the Ancient Greek debate on universals, this concept attained a systematic structure during the Middle Ages, becoming a horizon that defines the boundaries of modern philosophical practices. Various philosophical and political traditions have problematized established philosophical orthodoxy through the conceptual possibilities offered by nominalism. This study examines the reception of nominalism by different thinkers within the framework of critical theories, specifically focusing on Michel Foucault's historical nominalism. Furthermore, the article analyzes how nominalism, as one of the most potent theoretical foundations of anti-essentialist thought, nourishes the ontological ground of contemporary social movements and how the legacy of William of Ockham is reproduced within an oppositional habitus.
dc.identifier.doi10.29228/beytulhikme.90421
dc.identifier.endpage854
dc.identifier.issn1303-8303
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage829
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/4627
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001813981400012
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBEYTULHIKME FELSEFE CEVRESI
dc.relation.ispartofBEYTULHIKME-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectMedieval philosophy
dc.subjectuniversals
dc.subjectnominalism
dc.subjectWilliam of Ockham
dc.subjectFoucault
dc.subject.classificationPhilosophy
dc.titleThe Historical-PoliticalJourney of Nominalism from William of Ockham to Foucault
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)