Reassessment of Turkey’s objections to the exclusion of terrorism from the rome statute; [Terörizmin uluslararası ceza divanının yargı yetkisi dışında bırakılmış olmasına dair türkiyeʼnin İtirazlarının yeniden değerlendirilmesi]

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ3
  • SDG 16 · Barış, Adalet ve Güçlü Kurumlar

Özet

Criminal justice response to terrorism and to the support for terrorism is still a hot topic in Turkey due to ongoing American military support for the PYD, which is Syrian wing of the internationally designated terrorist organization PKK whose indiscriminate attacks in Turkey has claimed lives of thousands of civilians. This article first discusses, in light of recent developments, whether exclusion of a separate crime of terrorism from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court can be a valid argument against Turkey’s accession to it. After discovering some of the possible contributions of Turkey’s Rome Statute accession to its decades-long struggle against terrorism, this study concludes that Turkey’s all other concerns regarding the accession should be periodically reevaluated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/3798Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.653027Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
3
WoS
4
OpenAlex
2
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKurtuluş, Şehmus
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:57:08.511219085Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:57:08.511219085Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractCriminal justice response to terrorism and to the support for terrorism is still a hot topic in Turkey due to ongoing American military support for the PYD, which is Syrian wing of the internationally designated terrorist organization PKK whose indiscriminate attacks in Turkey has claimed lives of thousands of civilians. This article first discusses, in light of recent developments, whether exclusion of a separate crime of terrorism from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court can be a valid argument against Turkey’s accession to it. After discovering some of the possible contributions of Turkey’s Rome Statute accession to its decades-long struggle against terrorism, this study concludes that Turkey’s all other concerns regarding the accession should be periodically reevaluated.
dc.identifier.doi10.33458/uidergisi.653027
dc.identifier.endpage161
dc.identifier.issn1304-7310
dc.identifier.issue64
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85077055516
dc.identifier.startpage145
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/3798
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000500160100006
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInternational Relations Council of Turkey
dc.relation.ispartofUluslararasi Iliskiler
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectICC
dc.subjectPKK
dc.subjectRome statute of the international criminal court
dc.subjectTerrorism
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.subject.classificationInternational Relations
dc.titleReassessment of Turkey’s objections to the exclusion of terrorism from the rome statute; [Terörizmin uluslararası ceza divanının yargı yetkisi dışında bırakılmış olmasına dair türkiyeʼnin İtirazlarının yeniden değerlendirilmesi]
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex2
rdl.citation.scopus3
rdl.citation.wos4
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/866978
rdl.scopus.quartileQ3
rdl.sdgSDG16
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)