The Effect of Different Feeding Protocols on Compensatory Growth of Black Sea Trout Salmo trutta labrax

MakaleYalnız künyeScopus SJRQ3
  • SDG 2 · Açlığa Son

Özet

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of different feeding protocols on compensatory growth, feeding rate, and feed conversion efficiency of Black Sea Trout Salmo trutta labrax. To our knowledge, no previous feeding experiments with Black Sea Trout have incorporated a fasting period to simulate the handling and acclimation conditions experienced by farmed fish. Fifteen fish per tank (10.69 +/- 0.06cm and 13.22 +/- 0.14g, mean +/- SE) were stocked into 40-L fiberglass tanks. Fish were fed with different fasting-feeding regimes for 95 d and were equally allotted to four treatments (T-cont: control; T5-10: 5 d fasting, 10days feeding; T10-10: 10 d fasting, 10 d feeding; and T15-10: 15 d fasting, 10 d feeding) with three replicates per treatment. The results indicated that length (P = 0.0005), weight (P = 0.000), condition factor (P = 0.013), and specific growth rate (P = 0.014) were significantly affected by the interaction between feeding and time. All fasting treatments showed partial compensation during refeeding. There was an increase in daily feeding rate and feed conversion efficiency in fasting treatments compared with the control treatment. In contrast, at the end of the experiment specific growth rate, condition factor, and body weight in fasting treatments were significantly lower compared with the control treatment. We concluded that there was partial compensation of growth with regular refeeding after periods of feed deprivation (e.g., 5, 10, or 15 d) over a long term and a shorter fasting period may be preferred in order to achieve compensatory growth. Received November 9, 2012; accepted April 9, 2013

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/4366Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
WoS
6
OpenAlex
7
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKocabas, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorBasçinar, Nadir
dc.contributor.authorKayim, Murathan
dc.contributor.authorEr, Halil
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Halit
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T14:59:13.873283611Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T14:59:13.873283611Z
dc.date.issued2013-07
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to determine the effects of different feeding protocols on compensatory growth, feeding rate, and feed conversion efficiency of Black Sea Trout Salmo trutta labrax. To our knowledge, no previous feeding experiments with Black Sea Trout have incorporated a fasting period to simulate the handling and acclimation conditions experienced by farmed fish. Fifteen fish per tank (10.69 +/- 0.06cm and 13.22 +/- 0.14g, mean +/- SE) were stocked into 40-L fiberglass tanks. Fish were fed with different fasting-feeding regimes for 95 d and were equally allotted to four treatments (T-cont: control; T5-10: 5 d fasting, 10days feeding; T10-10: 10 d fasting, 10 d feeding; and T15-10: 15 d fasting, 10 d feeding) with three replicates per treatment. The results indicated that length (P = 0.0005), weight (P = 0.000), condition factor (P = 0.013), and specific growth rate (P = 0.014) were significantly affected by the interaction between feeding and time. All fasting treatments showed partial compensation during refeeding. There was an increase in daily feeding rate and feed conversion efficiency in fasting treatments compared with the control treatment. In contrast, at the end of the experiment specific growth rate, condition factor, and body weight in fasting treatments were significantly lower compared with the control treatment. We concluded that there was partial compensation of growth with regular refeeding after periods of feed deprivation (e.g., 5, 10, or 15 d) over a long term and a shorter fasting period may be preferred in order to achieve compensatory growth. Received November 9, 2012; accepted April 9, 2013
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15222055.2013.799621
dc.identifier.eissn1548-8454
dc.identifier.endpage435
dc.identifier.issn1522-2055
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage429
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/4366
dc.identifier.volume75
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000321608000012
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofNORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AQUACULTURE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject.classificationFisheries
dc.subject.otherCATFISH ICTALURUS-PUNCTATUS
dc.subject.otherJUVENILE ATLANTIC HALIBUT
dc.subject.otherX OREOCHROMIS-NILOTICUS
dc.subject.otherBODY-COMPOSITION
dc.subject.otherOXYGEN-CONSUMPTION
dc.subject.otherARCTIC CHARR
dc.subject.otherPARALICHTHYS-OLIVACEUS
dc.subject.otherDIETARY-PROTEIN
dc.subject.otherOLIVE FLOUNDER
dc.subject.otherHYBRID TILAPIA
dc.titleThe Effect of Different Feeding Protocols on Compensatory Growth of Black Sea Trout Salmo trutta labrax
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex7
rdl.citation.wos6
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.scopus.quartileQ3
rdl.sdgSDG02
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)