Cross-dressing in contemporary british feminist theatre

MakaleAçık Erişim
  • SDG 5 · Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği

Özet

Sex and gender are two concepts that are often unconsciously used interchangeably, but they have distinct meanings. They are crucial in understanding the gender hierarchy or the distinction between man and woman created by the patriarchal order. While sex refers to a biological difference or an innate existence based on signs such as chromosomes and genitals, gender is a socio-cultural identity subsequently acquired through social interaction. While the biology-oriented approach reduces femininity and masculinity to the body based on an essentialist approach, the socio-culturally oriented approach underlines that femininity and masculinity are culturally constructed, fluid, and changeable. The gender roles assigned to man and woman in patriarchal society bring along certain expectations based on their sexes and their society’s values and beliefs about gender. The fact that both woman and man are expected to wear appropriate dress for their gender roles is the reflection of this expectation. When a man wears clothing traditionally associated with women or when a woman wears clothing traditionally associated with men, they might face ridicule or criticism because these clothing choices challenge established gender norms, and because the clothes are reminders of roles or symbols that favour social roles. Contrary to this, cross-dressing is described as an act of wearing clothes and accessories that belong to the opposite sex, and it is possible to see its examples as a deconstructive strategy in contemporary British feminist theatre. This article aims at discussing the functions of cross-dressing as a body memory in contemporary British feminist theatre over selected plays such as Caryl Churchill’s plays Cloud Nine (1979) and Top Girls (1982), Timberlake Wertenbaker’s New Anatomies (1984), and Moira Buffini’s Silence (1999).

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/6233Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56597/kausbed.1425136Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
OpenAlex
2
TR Dizin
2
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorŞentürk, Gamze
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T15:11:24.792843074Z
dc.date.available2026-10-28T15:11:24.792843074Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractSex and gender are two concepts that are often unconsciously used interchangeably, but they have distinct meanings. They are crucial in understanding the gender hierarchy or the distinction between man and woman created by the patriarchal order. While sex refers to a biological difference or an innate existence based on signs such as chromosomes and genitals, gender is a socio-cultural identity subsequently acquired through social interaction. While the biology-oriented approach reduces femininity and masculinity to the body based on an essentialist approach, the socio-culturally oriented approach underlines that femininity and masculinity are culturally constructed, fluid, and changeable. The gender roles assigned to man and woman in patriarchal society bring along certain expectations based on their sexes and their society’s values and beliefs about gender. The fact that both woman and man are expected to wear appropriate dress for their gender roles is the reflection of this expectation. When a man wears clothing traditionally associated with women or when a woman wears clothing traditionally associated with men, they might face ridicule or criticism because these clothing choices challenge established gender norms, and because the clothes are reminders of roles or symbols that favour social roles. Contrary to this, cross-dressing is described as an act of wearing clothes and accessories that belong to the opposite sex, and it is possible to see its examples as a deconstructive strategy in contemporary British feminist theatre. This article aims at discussing the functions of cross-dressing as a body memory in contemporary British feminist theatre over selected plays such as Caryl Churchill’s plays Cloud Nine (1979) and Top Girls (1982), Timberlake Wertenbaker’s New Anatomies (1984), and Moira Buffini’s Silence (1999).
dc.identifier.doi10.56597/kausbed.1425136
dc.identifier.eissn2149-0643
dc.identifier.endpage144
dc.identifier.issn1307-5500
dc.identifier.issue33
dc.identifier.startpage119
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/munzur/6233
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofKafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectOrtaçağ ve Rönesans Çalışmaları
dc.subjectTransplantasyon
dc.subjectKadın Araştırmaları
dc.titleCross-dressing in contemporary british feminist theatre
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex2
rdl.citation.trdizin2
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.56597/kausbed.1425136
rdl.sdgSDG05
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN